-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 add preCreateCluster hook and CNIPath to e2e clusterctl upgrade test #6636
🌱 add preCreateCluster hook and CNIPath to e2e clusterctl upgrade test #6636
Conversation
|
Welcome @mboukhalfa! |
Hi @mboukhalfa. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
4652cb7
to
3598d7c
Compare
3598d7c
to
6da970e
Compare
6da970e
to
ed2953d
Compare
ed2953d
to
7a1f173
Compare
How can run the linter check ? |
You can't run it on PRs. Unfortunately on PRs of new contributors this can be approved only by someone with write access to the repo. This is a limitation in Prow today (/ok-to-test only works on ProwJobs not on golangci-lint actions). Locally you can run it with |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
Let's merge as it is to unblock work, but in future we might want to revisit this in order to split waiters for the management cluster from waiters for the workload cluster (names are randomly generated and with the current solution we can really detect when being called for one and when for the other).
Thanks @fabriziopandini from the provider side I am using |
c59ee5b
to
8e30ce0
Compare
@sbueringer I have rebased since #7244 just got merged can you please re LGTM |
8e30ce0
to
29e9d69
Compare
In general, yes. Just took another look at it and found something I was missing before. I would run the full e2e tests after this one is fixed and then merge afterwards (per default on PRs we just run a few tests and those don't include the clusterctl upgrade test) |
29e9d69
to
c5a7611
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main /cherry-pick release-1.2 |
@sbueringer: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.2 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
@sbueringer: #6636 failed to apply on top of branch "release-1.2":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds a
PreWaitForCluster
hook after creating the target management cluster to allow adding any custom resources that might be needed by some providers.Adds
CNIManifestPath
as an input parameter.Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #6465