Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Move machinepool and CRS feature gate checks to webhooks #6348

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2022

Conversation

Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR contains the changes to move the feature gate checks for Machinepool and CRS from main.go file to respective webhooks, This helps in better display of error messages for users incase they are trying to create resources without enabling the feature flags.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #6331

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 30, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this @Karthik-K-N! I think you've uncovered some issues with our linters with this change too 🙂 I've put in the ways to fix the imports below in suggestions.

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

pending one nit on a comment.

The other issues in this PR - MachinePool testing and the linter - we should handle elsewhere.

)

func TestMachinePoolConversion(t *testing.T) {
// NOTE: MachinePool feature flag is disabled by default, thus preventing to create or update MachinePool.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: I think it's fine to add this as part of this PR, but we should open an issue to update how the conversion tests/webhook in the MachinePool is done. I'm not sure what our testing area is exactly if we have this test in v1alpha3, but nothing in v1alpha4.

main.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 30, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 30, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 30, 2022
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 30, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 702d3f9 into kubernetes-sigs:main Mar 30, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.2 milestone Mar 30, 2022
@Karthik-K-N Karthik-K-N deleted the update-webhooks branch March 30, 2022 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enable feature flag disabled error reporting for MachinePool, ClusterResourceSet
4 participants