Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Add nil pointer check in UnstructuredUnmarshalField #6334

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2022

Conversation

killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

Fix a nil pointer in the UnstructuredUnmarshalField function which gets thrown if the Object supplied is equal to nil.

Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon [email protected]

Fixes #6333

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 24, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 24, 2022
Copy link
Contributor Author

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be backported I think - the original issue was spotted in 1.1.

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title Add nil pointer check in UnstructuredUnmarshalField 🐛 Add nil pointer check in UnstructuredUnmarshalField Mar 24, 2022
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

@killianmuldoon just to link this with the issue, should we also clusterctl discovery to add nil nodes (this could also have strange effects on the UX)?

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabriziopandini is the correct behaviour to display nil on the UX somehow? I'm not sure how this case is handled in clusterctl today. Should I try to approach it as part of this PR?

Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 28, 2022
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

@killianmuldoon do we still need this given that the root cause of thttps://github.com//issues/6333 seems to be condition missing (not the object being null)

@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd like to add this and create an issue to add similar checks to other public utils. I think these should never panic as we have no control over how they're consumed.

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 31, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 859d023 into kubernetes-sigs:main Mar 31, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.2 milestone Mar 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clusterctl describe cluster throws nil pointer exception is cluster is still provisioning
4 participants