Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚠️Remove hard code manifest version and hash #3908

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
⚠️Fixes #3505

(*clusterClient).CertManager: changed from func() CertManagerClient to func() (CertManagerClient, error)
Client.CertManager: changed from func() CertManagerClient to func() (CertManagerClient, error)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 11, 2020
@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

this is same PR to #3707 only with different target (v0.3 vs master)

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

same to #3707 only difference it this target to master, not v0.3

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

thanks @jichenjc !
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 11, 2020
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

Uhmm for some reason, CI triggered both 0.3 and 0.4 jobs...

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Unknown CLA label state. Rechecking for CLA labels.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/check-cla

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 11, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

thank you @jichenjc for your patience and your help in getting this to the right release branch

@wfernandes
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@wfernandes
Copy link
Contributor

I guess I don't have the permissions. 🤷
lgtm.
@CecileRobertMichon @fabriziopandini for approval.

@CecileRobertMichon
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 11, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm
/milestone v0.4.0

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 11, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CecileRobertMichon, vincepri, wfernandes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@CecileRobertMichon
Copy link
Contributor

Not mergeable. Job pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-0-3 has not succeeded.

hmm how come it's running 0.3 jobs? also shouldn't that job not be required?

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it's because API change
And I was told last time that this change is one time (we don't need to keep it consistent ) as next time it will be ok since the API already changed after the code merge..

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

And I don't know why it's requesting 0.3 version CI... seems I am pulling to master

@CecileRobertMichon
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@CecileRobertMichon
Copy link
Contributor

/override pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-0-3

It looks like prow is getting triggered on 0.3 because the same commit is targeting release-0.3 in the other PR

https://prow.k8s.io/pr?query=is%3Apr+repo%3Akubernetes-sigs%2Fcluster-api+author%3Ajichenjc+head%3Abug%2F3505

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon: CecileRobertMichon unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators.

In response to this:

/override pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-0-3

It looks like prow is getting triggered on 0.3 because the same commit is targeting release-0.3 in the other PR

https://prow.k8s.io/pr?query=is%3Apr+repo%3Akubernetes-sigs%2Fcluster-api+author%3Ajichenjc+head%3Abug%2F3505

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/override pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-0-3

because this job targets the v0.4.0 branch
not sure I have all the required grants...

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fabriziopandini: fabriziopandini unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators.

In response to this:

/override pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-0-3

because this job targets the v0.4.0 branch
not sure I have all the required grants...

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

the #3707 is closed ...
if necessary, I can resubmit the PR

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jichenjc: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main 2cd042c link /test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jichenjc
Copy link
Contributor Author

#3918
I recreated the PR to avoid same commit to different branch ...

@fabriziopandini @vincepri @wfernandes @CecileRobertMichon thanks for your support

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants