Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🏃KCP: Migrate from flags to pflags #2656

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2020

Conversation

sedefsavas
Copy link

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR move KCP flags to pflags for consistency with the rest of the code base.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sedefsavas. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 12, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 12, 2020
@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Mar 12, 2020

/ok-to-test
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 12, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/milestone v0.3.1

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.3.1 milestone Mar 12, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sedefsavas, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 12, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-verify

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

@sedefsavas can you rebase on master?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 12, 2020
@sedefsavas
Copy link
Author

@vincepri
Rebased but still getting the same error:

docs/book/src/developer/providers/implementers-guide/building_running_and_testing.md
	ERROR	https://cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/tasks/installation.html#install-cluster-api
		Not Found (HTTP error 404)

That link is actually missing.

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

@sedefsavas do you mind checking if the link is actually going 404 locally?

@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Mar 12, 2020

@vincepri I think the error is related to the removal of the separate Installation doc with it being incorporated into the quick start

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

Yeah, but it should have been caught in the other PR, I'm trying to understand if this is a false positive or if the verification job needs to be changed somehow

@sedefsavas
Copy link
Author

sedefsavas commented Mar 12, 2020

Yeah, but it should have been caught in the other PR, I'm trying to understand if this is a false positive or if the verification job needs to be changed somehow

Yes, tasks/installation.html is missing locally too.

It is moved in the previous PR merged:
5bb2219

@sedefsavas
Copy link
Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sedefsavas: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-capd-e2e 1459279 link /test pull-cluster-api-capd-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 12, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5252a7a into kubernetes-sigs:master Mar 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants