-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update sample/machineset.yaml to use new field and match docker version in machines.yaml.template #126
Conversation
Hi @k4leung4. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes or kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @kcoronado @krousey |
sample/machineset.yaml
Outdated
@@ -19,9 +19,10 @@ spec: | |||
project: "$GCLOUD_PROJECT" | |||
zone: "us-central1-f" | |||
machineType: "n1-standard-1" | |||
os: "ubuntu-1604-lts" | |||
image: "projects/ubuntu-os-cloud/global/images/family/ubuntu-1604-lts" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this the same ProviderConfig type as the one for GCE? If so, the image field was replaced by the os field so you should get rid of this line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's the other way around, you want to keep the os field and get rid of the image field (sorry)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
trying again.
lgtm |
@kcoronado: you can't request testing unless you are a kubernetes or kubernetes-sigs member. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hello Kenny, Please squash these three commits down to a single commit. Also, please update the commit message with what is being updated in machineset.yaml. It could be "Update machineset.yaml sample to include the latest fields". Also recommend calling it "sample/machineset.yaml" instead of "machineset.yaml sample". |
…n in machines.yaml.template
thanks for the suggestion. |
/ok-to-test |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: k4leung4, krousey The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Change imports from v1alpha1 to v1alpha2
Add certificate generation and secret lookup to bootstrap controller
Removed the terraform actuator code. Removed the terraform install in the Dockerfile. Updated all the code to remove MachineVariables. This actuator is no longer being maintain and slowly falling behind the govmomi actuators. Resolves kubernetes-sigs#125
What this PR does / why we need it:
Have docker version and os match that of the machine template
@kubernetes/kube-deploy-reviewers