Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicitly set GVK for IBMPoweVSCluster resource #1692

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

@Karthik-K-N Karthik-K-N commented Mar 27, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

Explicitly sets the GVK for IBMPowerVSCluster, Since we are excluding IBMPowerVSCluster object from cache, When we retrive the object we wont get TypeMeta associated with it because of it we are not able to filter out the childrens of the object , IBMPowerVSImage is one of them so it fails to delete it.

Also reverted the uncached client commit and updated the manager to exclude specifically IBMPowerVSCluster from cache.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #1690

Special notes for your reviewer:

/area provider/ibmcloud

  1. Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.

Release note:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 27, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 27, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-ibmcloud ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a5c78ef
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-ibmcloud/deploys/6603cb9e96736900087ec7d7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1692--kubernetes-sigs-cluster-api-ibmcloud.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@Amulyam24 Amulyam24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 27, 2024
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor Author

/lgtm

Thank you for testing and acknowledging.

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @mkumatag @Prajyot-Parab Please take a look.

Copy link
Contributor

@Prajyot-Parab Prajyot-Parab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Amulyam24, Karthik-K-N, Prajyot-Parab

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ff8b672 into kubernetes-sigs:main Mar 27, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

kubectl delete cluster <cluster_name> wont proceed untill we manually delete the IBMPowerVSImage
4 participants