-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: add useExperimentalRetryJoin: true to worker node spec #833
fix: add useExperimentalRetryJoin: true to worker node spec #833
Conversation
Hi @jackfrancis. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
@CecileRobertMichon curious, why not these two? https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-azure/blob/master/templates/flavors/external-cloud-provider/patches/external-cloud-provider.yaml#L39 I'm inferring that those patch configs will require a kubeadm restart of some kind to actually load the config diff, right? Is the retry foo we're adding here only valid for node registration operations, and those two patch configs don't engage node registration flows? |
(though both of those patches include a |
You're right, we want it there too! Basically every kubeadmConfigSpec should have it, control planes and worker nodes alike. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, @jackfrancis please squash the commits and add a release note
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
let's also mark this as "Fixes #832" since it solves the issue for now |
a1414d6
to
4e3bc9b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: CecileRobertMichon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds the
useExperimentalRetryJoin: true
kubeadm configuration to the worker node spec to prevent scenarios described in issue #832 from prevening nodes joining a cluster.Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #832
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please confirm that if this PR changes any image versions, then that's the sole change this PR makes.
TODOs:
Release note: