-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean up the whole of training-operator #1816
Comments
I take |
/reopen |
@tenzen-y: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
As utils are cleaned up, Is there something pending in this issue? |
@johnugeorge I think we need to decide how we handle the reconciler because the reconciler is dead codes. |
I think we can just remove the reconciler part. |
@zw0610 This part aim to give a unified controller implementation which do not depend on specific kind of job, am I right ? |
@kuizhiqing Currently, this is the responsibility of the controller. The reconciler provides functionality the similar to the controller using the concept inspired by controller-runtime. Although the reconciler's idea is much great, the reconciler is no longer maintained, a dead code. So I would suggest removing the reconciler. |
I added the last task, |
/assign @tenzen-y @johnugeorge |
@tenzen-y I think are aligned in this topic. I developed operators with controller-runtime heavily, so I think we do not fully take the advantage of it here. And I am agree with you that,
|
Yes, that's right. Thanks for being aligned. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
/remove-lifecycle remove I'm still working on the last piece. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
/good-first-issue |
@andreyvelich: Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. Please comment "/reopen" to reopen it. |
After merging kubeflow/common into this repo, we have many redundant and duplicated codes in this repo.
So, we should clean up the whole of this repo.
/kind cleanup
ref: #1813
cc: @johnugeorge @andreyvelich
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: