Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Specify names on service update and generate names client-side. #282
Specify names on service update and generate names client-side. #282
Changes from all commits
6dcb613
8080e3b
7e35c5b
aa84fb5
97ab0a4
dfdcc7e
476cc76
681ac3d
bda6abf
4a9e90f
5d6618f
657a61e
ad67c22
07897d1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we describe what "Generation" is in our docs some place?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a comment to explain that "Shared" means that these flags are common between both create() and update() ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's get this PR in before #345 so that #345 can add its flags in here too!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@duglin We add traffic flags separately on
service update
command. IMO they don't need to show up inConfigurationEditFlags
as updating traffic block is not configuration-edit operation and only traffic flags change don't result into a new revision.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From a UX perspective, I'd like to be able to setup the traffic during "service create" - that's all I'm asking for.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this seems excessively long for on-screen help text :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It inspired #351 . I think it's better to describe clearly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
only the first time, after that when people do --help it'll just annoy them
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hum. Roland suggested I add the part about the empty string. I think the part about the template is valuable, as it is not discoverable otherwise.
We could make it so, but we don't have a good place for that yet. I'd like to defer shortening it until we have a good place for other doc on options.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The better way to handle this separation would be to implement the suggestion from @cppforlife #79 (comment) logged as issue at #110, that should go as separate PR though and shouldn't block this one.