Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: describe the functional flow of a deployment #828

Closed
wants to merge 302 commits into from
Closed

docs: describe the functional flow of a deployment #828

wants to merge 302 commits into from

Conversation

StackScribe
Copy link
Contributor

@StackScribe StackScribe commented Feb 13, 2023

Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

This pulls together the basic information from the slack discussion. Now I need to fill in some details. Perhaps someone can point me to places in the source code where I might dig out some more information.

Closes #689
Epic: #770

@StackScribe StackScribe added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 13, 2023
@StackScribe StackScribe self-assigned this Feb 13, 2023
@StackScribe StackScribe marked this pull request as draft February 13, 2023 12:47
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 13, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #828 (03e1961) into main (27439ff) will increase coverage by 20.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #828       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   61.26%   81.31%   +20.04%     
===========================================
  Files         138      131        -7     
  Lines       10454     7872     -2582     
===========================================
- Hits         6405     6401        -4     
+ Misses       3799     1220     -2579     
- Partials      250      251        +1     

see 13 files with indirect coverage changes

Flag Coverage Δ
certificate-operator 64.28% <ø> (ø)
component-tests 60.45% <ø> (-0.22%) ⬇️
keptn-lifecycle-operator ?
lifecycle-operator 80.88% <ø> (ø)
metrics-operator 77.80% <ø> (ø)
scheduler 21.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@StackScribe StackScribe mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2023
6 tasks
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 12, 2023

Deploy Preview for keptn-lifecycle-toolkit ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ffcb79f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/keptn-lifecycle-toolkit/deploys/6450f7a11b311b000828fc35
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-828--keptn-lifecycle-toolkit.netlify.app/docs/concepts/architecture/deployment-flow
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@agardnerIT
Copy link
Contributor

I discovered this week that KLT isn't a custom scheduler but rather a scheduler plugin. The effect is the same but to be accurate, that's what it is.

This executes a series of
Kubernetes [events](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/kubernetes-api/cluster-resources/event-v1/).
Events are resources such as Deployments or Pods.

kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml doesn't execute a set of events. Events are just like log lines, they exist due to some other process. It is probably good enough to say kubectl apply... begins a deployment by triggering the kubernetes pod scheduler. During this process, events are omitted.

Typo: genereta should be generate

@StackScribe StackScribe marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2023 21:46
@StackScribe StackScribe requested review from a team as code owners April 24, 2023 21:46
agardnerIT
agardnerIT previously approved these changes Apr 25, 2023
@mowies mowies changed the title docs: functional flow of a deployment docs: describe the functional flow of a deployment Apr 25, 2023
Copy link
Member

@mowies mowies left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please change all bash code annotations to shell

mowies
mowies previously approved these changes Apr 26, 2023
renovate bot and others added 17 commits May 2, 2023 05:44
Signed-off-by: Renovate Bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
…ecurityContext (#1290)

Signed-off-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Co-authored-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Co-authored-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Co-authored-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florian Bacher <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Co-authored-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Co-authored-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Co-authored-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts [email protected]

Co-authored-by: odubajDT <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 2, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.7% 0.7% Duplication

@StackScribe
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is utterly corrupted and so is replaced by #1342

@StackScribe StackScribe closed this May 3, 2023
@StackScribe StackScribe deleted the 0211-deploy-arch branch May 3, 2023 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Page to describe lifecycle of events