Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initialise repo #1

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 21, 2020
Merged

Initialise repo #1

merged 7 commits into from
May 21, 2020

Conversation

NMinhNguyen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sanjayk
Copy link

sanjayk commented May 21, 2020

Can we add a Conventional Commit check?

module.exports = {
root: true,
env: {
browser: true,
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NMinhNguyen NMinhNguyen May 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's likely we'll need to use overrides to have different rules for Node.js vs browser packages (e.g. https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app/tree/master/packages/eslint-config-react-app for the latter) in the (very near) future but this should be okay for now.

ecmaFeatures: {
jsx: true,
},
ecmaVersion: 2020,
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NMinhNguyen NMinhNguyen May 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

npx eslint --init set this to 11, but I switched it to 2020 because it's more standard I think. But I actually wonder if we should lower this to the version that current Node.js LTS (10) supports, i.e. ES2017?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think setting it to 2020 is fine.

12 is the active LTS anyway. And by October, 14 will be active!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes but maintenance LTS is what is supported by the ecosystem typically..

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have a strong position on this, but am apt to pick whatever is new so we can use the latest APIs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jpmorganchase/modular-team thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we could use Babel (or rather, will most likely end up using Babel anyway) so it doesn't matter

.editorconfig Show resolved Hide resolved
@NMinhNguyen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can we add a Conventional Commit check?

PRs welcome 😛

es6: true,
node: true,
},
extends: [
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add it if it is good and catches semantic errors?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't want to get too carried away in the first PR, these are more just TODOs for future.

@sebinsua
Copy link
Contributor

sebinsua commented May 21, 2020

Can we add a Conventional Commit check?

This is a possibility.

But it suggests that we are going to generate changelogs from commit messages and if we are going to go that direction I would prefer if we could also consider other ways of generating changelogs that allow you to keep using more standard commit messages, for example changesets is very well-designed and has grown a lot in popularity over the last year.

See:

[0] https://twitter.com/4lpine/status/1256976979145797633
[1] https://twitter.com/buildsghost/status/1254583118243065860
[2] https://twitter.com/markdalgleish/status/1237573325590638598
[3] https://twitter.com/_philpl/status/1227986805246582785
[4] https://twitter.com/mitchellhamiltn/status/1179717008956411904

tsconfig.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
.eslintrc.js Show resolved Hide resolved
.eslintrc.js Show resolved Hide resolved
.gitignore Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@sebinsua sebinsua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wrote a few more comments.

@NMinhNguyen NMinhNguyen requested review from sebinsua and sanjayk May 21, 2020 20:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants