Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Pipeline Aggregator View #1209

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 22, 2023

Conversation

kamilszymanski
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@kamilszymanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@daspilker is there anything missing in this PR?

@kamilszymanski kamilszymanski force-pushed the pipeline-aggregator branch 2 times, most recently from d42553f to 9305be2 Compare November 12, 2021 22:49
@kamilszymanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jamietanna could you take a look at this PR?

@jamietanna
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the late reply. To confirm, does the Dynamic DSL not work for this?

@kamilszymanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Unfortunately dynamic DSL supports only generic view properties
dynamic-dsl

@jamietanna
Copy link
Contributor

FYI I've just been looking at this, but due to https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67157 I'm unable to test it locally. I'll try downgrading the plugin and giving it a go in the meantime

@basil basil requested a review from a team as a code owner March 22, 2023 05:13
Copy link
Member

@basil basil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR!

@basil basil changed the title add pipeline aggregator plugin support Add support for Pipeline Aggregator View Mar 22, 2023
@basil basil merged commit 6fe5d8e into jenkinsci:master Mar 22, 2023
@basil
Copy link
Member

basil commented Mar 22, 2023

Released in 1.83.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants