-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add create release pr workflow #1685
Conversation
a6fdea6
to
2b6ecba
Compare
8b11ff2
to
0bcc959
Compare
8a71b88
to
85e3849
Compare
85e3849
to
6ccbd8a
Compare
d1c4c9b
to
b18de09
Compare
b18de09
to
9f92426
Compare
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | |||
{ | |||
"categories": [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBD in retro
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LMK what you think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we include maintenance/housekeeping in there? Is this important for the user to know we did "Migrate from toEqual to toStrictEqual" for example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Maybe we can add a maintenance label. I didn't think to hard about it when I copied how DVC does it. Looks like they publish everything.
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | |||
{ | |||
"categories": [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we include maintenance/housekeeping in there? Is this important for the user to know we did "Migrate from toEqual to toStrictEqual" for example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hopefully we can figure out something a little more elegant, but this definitely works for now.
cf56beb
to
ecb0188
Compare
ecb0188
to
890e30c
Compare
Code Climate has analyzed commit c157429 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (85% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 96.7% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
Relates to #1691.
This PR adds a new workflow that will create a release PR which updates the changelog and extension version.
The release process will work as follows:
create-release-pr
againstmain
.publish
workflow. This will release to the marketplace, tags the commit and creates a GH release.Demo
#1692
TODO:
publish
workflow