fix(native-app): optional chaining for content.value and data.[0].mileage

[thoreyjona]

Noticed an error in datadog regarding these two things.

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• Formatting passes locally with my changes
• I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved error handling in the document detail screen to prevent runtime errors when accessing document content.
  • Enhanced application stability by implementing safer access methods for document properties.
  • Strengthened error handling in the vehicle mileage screen to ensure safe access to mileage data, preventing potential runtime errors.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifying the way certain properties are accessed in the code. Specifically, optional chaining is introduced when calling the replaceAll method on Document.content?.value and when accessing data[0]?.mileage. These updates ensure that the code handles cases where the objects may be null or undefined, thereby improving the robustness of the application.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
apps/native/app/src/screens/document-detail/document-detail.tsx	Modified the replaceAll method call to use optional chaining for safer access to Document.content?.value.
apps/native/app/src/screens/vehicles/vehicle-mileage.screen.tsx	Updated the assignment of latestMileage to use optional chaining for safer access to data[0]?.mileage.

Possibly related PRs

• fix(native-app): fix android crash due to borderRadius set to string value #16009: The changes in this PR involve the use of optional chaining for safely accessing properties, similar to the main PR's modifications to prevent runtime errors when accessing potentially undefined properties.

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4bb4ab8 and f479706.

Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/native/app/src/screens/document-detail/document-detail.tsx (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• apps/native/app/src/screens/document-detail/document-detail.tsx

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.84%. Comparing base (7651100) to head (5d15e07).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16003      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.84%   36.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6718     6718              
  Lines      137693   137725      +32     
  Branches    39143    39161      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        50739    50750      +11     
- Misses      86954    86975      +21     

Flag	Coverage Δ
api	3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api	41.67% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
application-template-api-modules	23.47% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
application-ui-shell	21.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 8 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7651100...5d15e07. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-island-is]

Datadog Report

All test runs 2877fea 🔗

✅ 4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 8 no change

Test Services

Service Name	Failed	Known Flaky	New Flaky	Passed	Skipped	Total Time	Code Coverage Change	Test Service View
api	0	0	0	4	0	3.43s	1 no change	Link
application-system-api	0	0	0	111	2	3m 39.95s	1 no change	Link
application-template-api-modules	0	0	0	109	0	2m 5.13s	1 no change	Link
application-ui-shell	0	0	0	74	0	41.92s	1 no change	Link

[snaerseljan]

👏