-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix --offline flag #8676
Fix --offline flag #8676
Conversation
Presumably, fixes #5346 |
@ulysses4ever Yeah, I was waiting until I got the tests passing before I pinged anyone |
No worries! Let's see... |
@ulysses4ever I got all the test steps you were talking about before working. The only issue is that when it errors it gives the file the error was called from and that could change later on. Not sure what the best fix for this is because I just sent up the error like Also as a note, because it's not downloading it from a remote repo I have to test the |
@ulysses4ever I can probably create a tag like there is for the ghc version etc. to capture error details and that would fix it. I don't think there is anything like that at the moment. |
I'm sorry I've been running a bit behind on cabal things. I'd have to defer this choice to someone more knowledgeable or just trust you. |
@cbclemmer: I'm thinking, could you have a look at |
@ulysses4ever No worries. I just had an idea and wanted to share. I'll look around the output validator code and see what I can find. |
@ulysses4ever I added the tag and now the tests pass. It looks like it was several years ago since the file that normalizes the output was last edited. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess we can do without the .vscode/tasks.json ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are getting there!
Also, what's up with cabal-testsuite/PackageTests/MultipleLibraries/T7270/p/Main
?
elabPkgSourceId = PackageIdentifier { pkgName, pkgVersion } | ||
} = (elabUnitId, Left (BuildFailure { | ||
buildFailureLogFile = Nothing, | ||
buildFailureReason = DownloadFailed . error $ makeError pkgName pkgVersion |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it shouldn't involve error
: it's not an exceptional situation like a network failure, or something else out of our control, it's we who are refusing to do something because of the flag -- it's no exception! So, I think, it should be DependentFailed
rather than DownloadFailed
. Perhaps someone has another opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DependentFailed
needs another package as a parameter this looks like it's used to say that the package that is failing has a dependency that failed. I need to say that this specific package failed while also not producing an exception. Nothing else in the BuildFailureReason
data type looked like it suited the problem so I added a GracefulFailure
option to BuildFailureReason
and it takes a string that will be printed to the terminal without any extra text or callstack, I think anything more specific would clutter up the data type more than is needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Full disclosure: I'm no expert in Cabal error types. But, I thought that DependentFailed
would work quite all right for this use case. Imagine you depend on 10 packages and 9 of them are in the cache. Then, you may want to know which one wasn't there. On the other hand, if there're two dependencies that are not in the cache then reporting just one is not so nice, perhaps. Although, I could live with reporting one that happened to be the first to be required during the build…
That said, I don't have a strong preference. I'm just not a big fan of changing data types that sound fundamental. Cabal is a library and this would be a breaking change...
@cbclemmer just a gentle ping. Great work here, just need to fix minor things... |
I sense we're getting close. We need reviewers and possibly a backport. I'll add my final review ASAP but we'd need another one. |
@Kleidukos I didn't see your review before. It's deleted now. I must have randomly pressed F5 at some point... |
No problem :) |
@Kleidukos you requested changes on this PR (#8676 (review)) and I believe they were applied, so maybe you could either unblock it or even approve it? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! :)
} = do | ||
|
||
} | ||
| fromFlagOrDefault False (projectConfigOfflineMode config) && not (null packagesToDownload) = return offlineError |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you could use notNull
instead of not
and null
separately.
@cbclemmer you should feel free to put the squash+merge label now. Thank you for your contribution, and keep the good stuff coming!!! 🎉 |
@ulysses4ever Thanks, I looked up notNull on hoogle and I thought it was included in the prelude but apparently it wasn't. I've reverted my changes and now it needs to do the build process again. Thanks for reviewing it |
@cbclemmer oh my, I'm so sorry! The reason for my mishmash is that I confused it with |
@mergify backport 3.10 |
✅ Backports have been created
|
* WIP * WIP * WIP * WIP * WIP * add offline logic branch * Clean up * Formatting * Optimize * Rename test folder * Add changelog file * Fix whitespace * Add <CABAL_ERROR> normalizer tag * code review changes * Delet vs code file * Fix import * fix wrong output file --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 0ed1218)
* WIP * WIP * WIP * WIP * WIP * add offline logic branch * Clean up * Formatting * Optimize * Rename test folder * Add changelog file * Fix whitespace * Add <CABAL_ERROR> normalizer tag * code review changes * Delet vs code file * Fix import * fix wrong output file --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Please include the following checklist in your PR:
The --offline flag previously created in #2578 but was only implemented for the install command even thought the flag didn't throw an error whenever the build command was run. This PR adds functionality for the --offline flag with the build command.
Additionally there is a new PackageTest for the flag using the build command.