Revert alternative logo

[rhendric]

Six months ago:

[tomjaguarpaw]

Fine by me

[MangoIV]

But why would we revert it?

[tomjaguarpaw]

Exactly because part of the justification for adding it was that it would be temporary. It would set a bad precedent to keep something that was explicitly justified on the grounds of being temporary. If people do want to keep it, that's fine, but I think it should go through another proposal process.

(In retrospect I think we ought to have set a time limit on it, after which it would have been "pre-approved" for reversion, absent another vote to keep it.)

[pera]

I think it's a fun Easter egg so I would say keep it.

[tomjaguarpaw]

I think it's a fun Easter egg so I would say keep it.

I'm inclined to agree actually. It seems fun and I don't think it's doing any harm. But it is up to the people who want to keep it permanently to make such a proposal and advocate for it, otherwise we're going to lose trust in proposals whose proponents claim "this is only temporary".

[kutyel]

I think it does not hurt anyone if we keep it and also it shows that the Haskell community still has a nice sense of humour 😉

[tomjaguarpaw]

OK, let's have a committee vote in #321

[pedroid999]

I propose giving a community hug to the person who proposed removing the logo, I think he needs it.