-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resource_arm_sql_database: switch dependency from riviera to azure-sdk-for-go #191
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @sebastus
Thanks for this PR - apologies for the delayed review on this, I'd started reviewed it but not hit submit :(
I've taken a look through and left some comments but this is off to a good start :)
Thanks!
Default: "Default", | ||
Type: schema.TypeString, | ||
Optional: true, | ||
Default: "Default", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we use the enum in the SDK for this? i.e. string(sql.Default)
Type: schema.TypeString, | ||
Optional: true, | ||
Default: "Default", | ||
ValidateFunc: validateArmSqlDatabaseCreateMode, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should be able to remove this in favour of an in-line validation function:
ValidateFunc: validation.StringInSlice([]string{
string(sql.Copy),
string(sql.RestoreLongTermRetentionBackup),
string(sql.Default),
string(sql.NonReadableSecondary),
string(sql.OnlineSecondary),
string(sql.PointInTimeRestore),
string(sql.Recovery),
string(sql.Restore),
string(sql.RestoreLongTermRetentionBackup),
}, true)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we add a reference to the DiffSuppressFunc which will ignore differences in case here:
DiffSuppressFunc: ignoreCaseDiffSuppressFunc,
if v, ok := d.GetOk("collation"); ok { | ||
command.Collation = azure.String(v.(string)) | ||
} | ||
edition := sql.DatabaseEdition(d.Get("edition").(string)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
given this field is optional, I think we want to optionally assign it to props
below? i.e.
if v, ok := d.GetOk("edition"); ok {
props.Edition = sql.DatabaseEdition(v.(string))
}
requestedServiceObjectiveNameString := d.Get("requested_service_objective_name").(string) | ||
var requestedServiceObjectiveName sql.ServiceObjectiveName | ||
|
||
if requestedServiceObjectiveIDString != "" && requestedServiceObjectiveNameString == "" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can use the conflicts_with
option in the Schema to handle this for us automatically, i.e.:
"requested_service_objective_id": {
Type: schema.TypeString,
Optional: true,
Computed: true,
ConflictsWith: []string{ "requested_service_objective_name" },
},
"requested_service_objective_name": {
Type: schema.TypeString,
Optional: true,
Computed: true,
ConflictsWith: []string{ "requested_service_objective_id" },
},
and then just have if statements for each field, and assign the value directly to props as needed, rather than checking the state of both:
if v, ok := d.Get("requested_service_objective_id").(string); ok {
rsoid, err := uuid.FromString(v.(string))
if err != nil {
return err
}
props.RequestedServiceObjectiveID = &rsoid
}
if v, ok := d.Get("requested_service_objective_name").(string); ok {
props.RequestedServiceObjectiveID = sql.ServiceObjectiveName(v.(string))
}
createResponse, err := createRequest.Execute() | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return fmt.Errorf("Error creating SQL Database: %s", err) | ||
if requestedServiceObjectiveNameString == "ElasticPool" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there an enum/constant we can use for this?
databaseName := id.Path["databases"] | ||
|
||
result, error := sqlDatabasesClient.Delete(resGroup, serverName, databaseName) | ||
if result.Response.StatusCode != http.StatusOK { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -257,3 +287,20 @@ func validateArmSqlDatabaseEdition(v interface{}, k string) (ws []string, errors | |||
} | |||
return | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func validateArmSqlDatabaseCreateMode(v interface{}, k string) (ws []string, errors []error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(if we switch to using the validation.StringInStrings
and the enum's/constants above - I think we can remove this?)
if !readResponse.IsSuccessful() { | ||
return fmt.Errorf("Bad: GetDatabase: %s", readResponse.Error) | ||
|
||
if resp.StatusCode == http.StatusNotFound { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we update this to be within the err statement above, as 404 should be being returned as an error
if err != nil { | ||
return fmt.Errorf("Bad: GetDatabase: %s", err) | ||
return nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we update this to return the error, and add a check for if 404 { return nil }
- given a 404 is an error type?
|
||
for _, rs := range s.RootModule().Resources { | ||
if rs.Type != "azurerm_sql_database" { | ||
if rs.Type != "azurerm_sql_database_record" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we change this back to azurerm_sql_database
, given that's the resource name?
Hey @sebastus I've been working on a similar task which requires the Riviera SDK to be removed - as such I've rolled your PR's (#191 #190 and #178) into a new PR - which also removes the bulk of the Riviera SDK; I hope you don't mind (and we really appreciate your efforts here) - and this is visible in #289. As such I'm going to close this PR for the moment in favour of #289. Thanks! |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
No description provided.