Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Add support for new Preview features (LB Standard, Public IP Standard, Availability Zones, High Availability Ports) #579

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
justaugustus opened this issue Nov 21, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@justaugustus
Copy link
Contributor

justaugustus commented Nov 21, 2017

This is a bucket issue for adding support for the following upcoming Azure Preview features:

We (CoreOS) would like to add support for this feature set in Tectonic, but it will be dependent on formal upstream support for the features in the Azure SDK for Go and the azurerm TF provider.

x-ref: coreos/tectonic-installer#2443

Upstream refs:

cc: @robszumski / @metral

justaugustus added a commit to justaugustus/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this issue Jan 4, 2018
justaugustus added a commit to justaugustus/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this issue Jan 5, 2018
justaugustus added a commit to justaugustus/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2018
justaugustus added a commit to justaugustus/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2018
@justaugustus justaugustus changed the title Feature Request: Add support for Azure LB Standard and associated components Feature Request: Add support for new Preview features (LB Standard, Public IP Standard, Availability Zones, High Availability Ports) Feb 4, 2018
@metacpp metacpp self-assigned this Feb 6, 2018
@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

hey @justaugustus

Taking another look through this issue it appears the remaining feature requests are duplicates of #370 (for Availability Zones) and #372 (High Availability Ports) - as such I'm going to close this combined issue in favour of the specific ones - just so it's easier to track, I hope you don't mind!

Thanks!

@justaugustus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good, @tombuildsstuff. Thanks for the heads-up!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 31, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost unassigned metacpp Mar 31, 2020
@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants