Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1255 refactor current data into data external #1267

Conversation

akibrhast
Copy link
Member

@akibrhast akibrhast commented Mar 19, 2021

Fixes #1266

  • Refactor the current data into data/external (including fixing the GH actions that populate it)

Please looks at the commit messages for reference to what this pr changes

@akibrhast akibrhast requested a review from cnk March 19, 2021 20:07
@cnk
Copy link
Member

cnk commented Mar 19, 2021

Looks OK at a glance. Does someone else have time to review it properly?

@cnk cnk removed their request for review March 19, 2021 21:25
@cnk
Copy link
Member

cnk commented Mar 19, 2021

And I think .github/workflows/_wins-data.yml and .github/workflows/wins-data.yml are 2 versions of the same thing. Suspect only one is in use. Could someone check and delete the one that is no longer in use? In this reorg or in a separate PR.

@akibrhast
Copy link
Member Author

@cnk They are not the same file one is using curl to pull data, one is using node script to pull data. You are right that currently only one of them is in use. The _wins-data.yml is a work in progress that would eventually be used instead of the current wins-data.yml will be deleted and the _wins-data.yml will be renamed to wins-data.yml

@jbubar
Copy link
Member

jbubar commented Mar 19, 2021

@cnk What would be the best way to review this?
It looks good to me, but I am not sure how to review it because they are github actions

@cnk
Copy link
Member

cnk commented Mar 20, 2021

@jbubar For testing substantial changes to GitHub actions, I usually change the triggering conditions so I can run them at will - and then run them in my fork.

But for the changes here, simply changing the directory where the data is written, I think it is sufficient to proofread the files to make sure we caught all places that need to be changed to match.

Copy link
Member

@jbubar jbubar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I proof read it very closely, but I did not test it out. I think it should be good

@jbubar jbubar merged commit 8354439 into hackforla:gh-pages Mar 21, 2021
@jbubar
Copy link
Member

jbubar commented Mar 21, 2021

Looked over it a few more times, and merged it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor The Current Data
3 participants