-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add security.txt #2026
Add security.txt #2026
Conversation
dist/doc/usage.md
Outdated
@@ -121,6 +123,14 @@ technology powering it. | |||
|
|||
Edit this file to include any pages you need hidden from search engines. | |||
|
|||
### .well-known | |||
|
|||
RFC5785 [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785) defines '.well-known' as a unique location for content discover. It contains one file - security.txt. |
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks for the PR - It's an interesting addition. I hadn't previously heard of this. it doesn't appear to be very well known (pun not intended) yet. If this PR were to be merged, the additions to the |
I see a lot of 404s for this |
* Added clarifying information and created identical copy in src/.
PR updated with feedback. |
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | |||
# Our security address |
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
||
### security.txt | ||
|
||
When security risks in web services are discovered by independent security researchers who understand the severity of the risk, they often lack the channels to disclose them properly. As a result, security issues may be left unreported. Security.txt defines a standard to help organizations define the process for security researchers to disclose security vulnerabilities securely. |
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks again for this PR @oehm-smith - we've decided to give this a mention in the 'extend' docs with a link to https://securitytxt.org/ for more details. |
Cool no worries Christian. Apologies for not getting back to it as
always became a lower priority.
…On 9/10/18 4:55 pm, Christian Oliff wrote:
Thanks again for this PR @oehm-smith <https://github.com/oehm-smith> -
we've decided to give this a mention in the 'extend' docs with a link
to https://securitytxt.org/ for more details.
Will be part of the #2074
<#2074> PR
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2026 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACcCsxJLGDcpopDkvK1QRzo22ieocn5Vks5ujDpegaJpZM4SFKTc>.
|
Types of changes
Checklist: