You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing panaroo, it's great to have a tool to explore the pangenome as a graph!
I was exploring a graph made from 16 whole bacterial genomes and I'm having troubles interpreting some of the graph features.
In the example below, the 3 highlighted nodes all have a size of 16, with a single copy of each of these genes in each genome of my dataset. So I don't understand how there can be 2 paths going from galE to group_1247 (galE>1247 and galE>3811>1247).
Thank you for your help,
hdore
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I think I found a possible explanation: one of the genes in group_3811 is a refound gene. The edge galE>1247 is supported by only 1 genome, which corresponds to the genome with the refound gene.
Thus it seems that the edges in the graph are not updated with the refound genes. Is there a reason behind this? I find it quite misleading, in particular when looking at potential structural variants, since we are loosing the power of genes refinding from Panaroo.
Best,
hdore
hdore
changed the title
Need help interpreting the graph
Edges in the graph are not updated with refound genes
Dec 3, 2021
Yes, currently the edges are not updated to reflect refound genes. This is a bug (originally reported in #83) that I'm hoping to fix in future versions. It does not impact on the building of the graph and presence/absence matrices but can make interpretation more difficult. I will try and patch this soon.
Hello,
Thank you for developing panaroo, it's great to have a tool to explore the pangenome as a graph!
I was exploring a graph made from 16 whole bacterial genomes and I'm having troubles interpreting some of the graph features.
In the example below, the 3 highlighted nodes all have a size of 16, with a single copy of each of these genes in each genome of my dataset. So I don't understand how there can be 2 paths going from galE to group_1247 (galE>1247 and galE>3811>1247).
Thank you for your help,
hdore
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: