Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CRISPR update #866

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 6, 2022
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
29 changes: 23 additions & 6 deletions content/10.diagnostics.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -101,12 +101,12 @@ The SHERLOCK method (Specific High-sensitivity Enzymatic Reporter unLOCKing) fro
The target RNA is amplified by RT-RPA and T7 transcription, and the amplified product activates Cas13a.
The nuclease then cleaves a reporter RNA, which liberates a fluorescent dye from a quencher.
Several groups have used the SHERLOCK method to detect SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA.
An early study reported that the method could detect 7.5 copies of viral RNA in all 10 replicates, 2.5 copies in 6 out of 10, and 1.25 copies in 2 out of 10 runs [@doi:10.1101/2020.02.22.20025460].
An early study reported that the method could detect 7.5 copies of viral RNA in all 10 replicates, 2.5 copies in 6 out of 10, and 1.25 copies in 2 out of 10 runs [@doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008705].
It also reported 100% specificity and sensitivity on 114 RNA samples from clinical respiratory samples (61 suspected cases, among which 52 were confirmed and nine were ruled out by metagenomic next-generation sequencing, 17 nCoV-/HCoV+ cases and 36 samples from healthy subjects), and a reaction turnaround time of 40 minutes.
A separate study screened four designs of SHERLOCK and extensively tested the best-performing assay.
They determined the limit of detection to be 10 copies/μl using both fluorescent and lateral flow detection [@doi:10.1101/2020.02.26.967026].
Lateral flow test strips are simple to use and read, but there are limitations in terms of availability and cost per test.
Another group therefore proposed the CREST protocol (Cas13-based, Rugged, Equitable, Scalable Testing), which uses a P51 cardboard fluorescence visualizer, powered by a 9V battery, for the detection of Cas13 activity instead of immunochromatography [@doi:10.1101/2020.04.20.052159].
Another group therefore proposed the CREST protocol (Cas13-based, Rugged, Equitable, Scalable Testing), which uses a P51 cardboard fluorescence visualizer, powered by a 9V battery, for the detection of Cas13 activity instead of immunochromatography [@doi:10.1128/JCM.02402-20].
CREST can be run, from RNA sample to result, with no need for AC power or a dedicated facility, with minimal handling in approximately 2 hours.
Testing was performed on 14 nasopharyngeal swabs.
CREST picked up the same positives as the CDC-recommended TaqMan assay with the exception of one borderline sample that displayed low-quality RNA.
Expand All @@ -120,20 +120,37 @@ The assay had 95% positive predictive agreement and 100% negative predictive agr
The estimated limit of detection was 10 copies per μl reaction, versus 1 copy per μl reaction for the CDC assay.
These results have been confirmed by other DETECTR approaches.
Using RTRPA for amplification, another group detected 10 copies of synthetic SARS-CoV-2 RNA per μl of input within 60 minutes of RNA sample preparation in a proof-of-principle evaluation [@doi:10.1101/2020.02.29.971127].
Using a similar approach, another group reported detection at 1 copy per μl [@doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000978].
The DETECTR protocol was improved by combining RT-RPA and CRISPR-based detection in a one-pot reaction that incubates at a single temperature, and by using dual crRNAs (which increases sensitivity).
This new assay, known as All-In-One Dual CRISPR-Cas12a (AIOD-CRISPR), detected 4.6 copies of SARS-CoV-2 RNA per μl of input in 40 minutes [@doi:10.1101/2020.03.19.998724].
Another single-tube, constant-temperature approach using Cas12b instead of Cas12a achieved a detection limit of 5 copies/μl in 40-60 minutes [@doi:10.1101/2020.04.10.023358].
It was also reported that electric field gradients can be used to control and accelerate CRISPR assays by co-focusing Cas12-gRNA, reporters, and target [@doi:10.1101/2020.05.21.109637].
This new assay, known as All-In-One Dual CRISPR-Cas12a (AIOD-CRISPR), detected 4.6 copies of SARS-CoV-2 RNA per μl of input in 40 minutes [@doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18575-6].
Another single-tube, constant-temperature approach using Cas12b instead of Cas12a achieved a detection limit of 5 copies/μl in 40-60 minutes [@doi:10.1038/s41421-020-0174-y].
It was also reported that electric field gradients can be used to control and accelerate CRISPR assays by co-focusing Cas12-gRNA, reporters, and target [@doi:10.1073/pnas.2010254117].
The authors generated an appropriate electric field gradient using a selective ionic focusing technique known as isotachophoresis (ITP) implemented on a microfluidic chip.
They also used ITP for automated purification of target RNA from raw nasopharyngeal swab samples.
Combining this ITP purification with loop-mediated isothermal amplification, their ITP-enhanced assay to achieved detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (from raw sample to result) in 30 minutes.

All these methods required upstream nucleic acid amplification prior to CRISPR-based detection.
They are relying on type V (Cas12-based) and type IV (Cas13-based) CRISPR systems.
In contrast, type III CRISPR systems have the unique property of initiating a signalling cascade, which could boost the sensitivity of direct RNA detection.
rando2 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
A study tested this hypothesis using the type III-A CRISPR RNA (crRNA)-guided surveillance complex from Thermus thermophilus [@doi:10.1101/2020.10.14.20212670].
They showed that activation of the Cas10 polymerase generates three products (cyclic nucleotides, protons, pyrophosphates) that can all be used to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
Direct detection was 100-fold more sensitive than direct detection by Cas13.
Detection of viral RNA in patient samples still required an initial nucleic acid amplification step, but improvements may in the future remove that requirement.

This goal of amplification-free detection was later achieved for a Cas13a-based system [@doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.001].
This approach combined multiple CRISPR RNAs to increase Cas13a activation, which is detected by a fluorescent reporter.
Importantly, because the viral RNA is detected directly, the test yields a quantitative measurement rather than a binary result.
The study also shows that fluorescence can be measured in a custom-made dark box with a mobile phone camera and a low-cost laser illumination and collection optics.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would leave that part out if the accuracy mentioned below was not achieved by the phone camera approach because that could be misleading.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These results were achieved using the phone-based setup: "A third key advance in our work is the demonstration that a compact microscope based on a mobile phone and low-cost optics can accurately read the Cas13a direct detection assay, enabling ∼100 copies/μL sensitivity in 30 min of measurement and accurate diagnosis of a set of pre-extracted RNA from patient samples in 5 min of measurement time on the device."

This makes this approach a truly portable assay for point-of-care diagnostics.
The authors achieved detection of 100 copies/μl of pre-isolated RNA in 30 minutes, and correctly identified all SARS-CoV-2-positive patient RNA samples tested in 5 minutes (n=20).

There is an increasing body of evidence that CRISPR-based assays offer a practical solution for rapid, low-barrier testing in areas that are at greater risk of infection, such as airports and local community hospitals.
In the largest study to date, DETECTR was compared to qRT-PCR on 378 patient samples [@doi:10.1101/2020.07.27.20147249].
In the largest study to date, DETECTR was compared to qRT-PCR on 378 patient samples [@doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa641].
The authors reported a 95% reproducibility.
Both techniques were equally sensitive in detecting SARS-CoV-2.
Lateral flow strips showed a 100% correlation to the high-throughput DETECTR assay.
Importantly, DETECTR was 100% specific for SARS-CoV-2 and did not detect other human coronaviruses.
A method based on a Cas9 ortholog from Francisella novicida (FnCas9) achieved 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity in clinical samples, and the diagnostic kit is reported to have completed regulatory validation in India [@doi:10.1101/2020.09.13.20193581].

#### Limitations of Molecular Tests

Expand Down