Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distinguishing road types, especially Motorways, isn't obvious enough in the new colour scheme #1946

Closed
KenBW2 opened this issue Nov 1, 2015 · 11 comments

Comments

@KenBW2
Copy link

KenBW2 commented Nov 1, 2015

I take the point from that using the UK road colour scheme isn't intuituve, but it did a very good job of distinguishing between different types of road.

Particularly Motorways - there's a very big difference between a primary road and a motorway, and on long journeys it's far and away the preferred choice of road.

In the new colour scheme, both primary roads and motorways are near enough the same colour, and it's not obvious at a glance which is the motorway. See below for an example.

digix5l

I'd like to propose a new colour for motorways which reflects their importance relative to other road types.

@KenBW2 KenBW2 changed the title Red Motorways aren't obvious enough in the new colour scheme Distinguishing road types isn't obvious enough in the new colour scheme Nov 1, 2015
@KenBW2 KenBW2 changed the title Distinguishing road types isn't obvious enough in the new colour scheme Distinguishing road types, especially Motorways, isn't obvious enough in the new colour scheme Nov 1, 2015
@matthijsmelissen
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this an issue that plays for you at all zoom levels, or are there particular zoom levels where this is a problem?

@KenBW2
Copy link
Author

KenBW2 commented Nov 1, 2015

I'd say anything <= Z12

screenshot from 2015-11-01 18 39 41

screenshot from 2015-11-01 18 39 20

screenshot from 2015-11-01 18 42 20

@jojo4u
Copy link

jojo4u commented Nov 2, 2015

Yes, on first glance it's difficult to make out the motorways. But perhaps we are too used of this read-centric view. The goal of osm-carto is not a map showing roads as prominent as e.g. Google Maps.

@KenBW2
Copy link
Author

KenBW2 commented Nov 2, 2015

Jack of all trades, master of none?

The original rationale of the change wasn't to make roads less prominent - it was because the UK colour scheme of Blue, Green, Red, Yellow wasn't considered intuitive. I personally don't like that that change was made, but I understand the reason for it.

But the change has become in my mind a regression. Where before motorways were easily distinguishable they're now almost invisible against the backdrop. I feel quite strongly that we should find a colour that satisfies both requirements.

@AlbertJP
Copy link

AlbertJP commented Nov 2, 2015

I do not have so much trouble in finding the red motorways on the map. The first thing that struck me, was that motorways now have more emphasis compared to their surrounding area in zoom levels around 15, especially those running in forests. I suddenly start noticing the red names of junctions and exits overlaying the map, which did not catch my eye when they were blue.
To be honest my first thought was that OSM had become a map for motorists, and I am not one of them. I currently don't have problems with the red colour any more; I am however wondering, whether a darker or more saturated (less pink) shade of red would be an improvement for both of us. I would like other users' input on this- I see we have very different reasons to dislike the red, because it's too prominent or because it's not prominent enough.

@RobJN
Copy link

RobJN commented Nov 2, 2015

If I recall there was a go at making motorways more purple but this then clashed with the admin boundaries. A lot has changed recently so perhaps someone could look at moving admin boundaries to a different colour thus freeing up more space to move the motorway into.

@KenBW2
Copy link
Author

KenBW2 commented Nov 2, 2015

I suddenly start noticing the red names of junctions and exits overlaying the map, which did not catch my eye when they were blue

Completely agree - I thought the font size was bigger now but maybe it's just the colour. I approve this change

I am however wondering, whether a darker or more saturated (less pink) shade of red would be an improvement for both of us

I was thinking a darker would serve as a good compromise that can satisfy all parties. It's more prominent, but still within the same colour range hence satisfying the colour-indicates-way-type methodology.

Examples thrown together in Gimp with hex code #B55757:

close

mid

far

@Gazer75
Copy link

Gazer75 commented Nov 3, 2015

I hope one day there will be country specific rendering. Maybe it will be to confusing.

For me the first color that comes to mind when people say motorway is blue. All motorway signs have a blue background here in Norway. For this reason I really miss the old blue.

Current rendering is to similar to trunk though and should be changed to something else.

@BalooUriza
Copy link

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Gazer75 [email protected] wrote:

I hope one day there will be country specific rendering. Maybe it will be
to confusing.

Certainly see problems at the data level for this, since reading a relation
is relatively cheap and geocoding, comparatively, isn't. It would pretty
much mean eliminating road routes from tags on the way (eg ref=*) and
moving that to route relations (a transition that needed to happen years
ago, and the sooner we do it, the easier it's going to be).

@KenBW2
Copy link
Author

KenBW2 commented Nov 4, 2015

I agree that country specific rendering would be great (Mapquest Open does this), but I think that's a separate feature request.

Let's keep this Issue focussed on the simple colour change.

@matthijsmelissen
Copy link
Collaborator

We have chosen to render four different colors of roads - and that inevitably means they are close together in the color space. I'm afraid I don't think there's much we can do here (without giving up the 4 color roads).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants