Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update react-router monorepo #81118

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024
Merged

Update react-router monorepo #81118

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@remix-run/router (source) 1.11.0 -> 1.14.2 age adoption passing confidence
react-router (source) 6.2.1 -> 6.21.3 age adoption passing confidence
react-router-dom-v5-compat (source) 6.10.0 -> 6.21.3 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

remix-run/react-router (@​remix-run/router)

v1.14.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix bug where dashes were not picked up in dynamic parameter names (#​11160)
  • Do not attempt to deserialize empty JSON responses (#​11164)

v1.14.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with route.lazy not working correctly on initial SPA load when v7_partialHydration is specified (#​11121)
  • Fix bug preventing revalidation from occurring for persisted fetchers unmounted during the submitting phase (#​11102)
  • De-dup relative path logic in resolveTo (#​11097)

v1.14.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Added a new future.v7_partialHydration future flag that enables partial hydration of a data router when Server-Side Rendering. This allows you to provide hydrationData.loaderData that has values for some initially matched route loaders, but not all. When this flag is enabled, the router will call loader functions for routes that do not have hydration loader data during router.initialize(), and it will render down to the deepest provided HydrateFallback (up to the first route without hydration data) while it executes the unhydrated routes. (#​11033)

    For example, the following router has a root and index route, but only provided hydrationData.loaderData for the root route. Because the index route has a loader, we need to run that during initialization. With future.v7_partialHydration specified, <RouterProvider> will render the RootComponent (because it has data) and then the IndexFallback (since it does not have data). Once indexLoader finishes, application will update and display IndexComponent.

    let router = createBrowserRouter(
  [
    {
      id: "root",
      path: "/",
      loader: rootLoader,
      Component: RootComponent,
      Fallback: RootFallback,
      children: [
        {
          id: "index",
          index: true,
          loader: indexLoader,
          Component: IndexComponent,
          HydrateFallback: IndexFallback,
        },
      ],
    },
  ],
  {
    future: {
      v7_partialHydration: true,
    },
    hydrationData: {
      loaderData: {
        root: { message: "Hydrated from Root!" },
      },
    },
  }
);

    If the above example did not have an IndexFallback, then RouterProvider would instead render the RootFallback while it executed the indexLoader.

    Note: When future.v7_partialHydration is provided, the <RouterProvider fallbackElement> prop is ignored since you can move it to a Fallback on your top-most route. The fallbackElement prop will be removed in React Router v7 when v7_partialHydration behavior becomes the standard behavior.

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Routes>
    </div>
  );
}

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
function DashboardTeam() {
  // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
  return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;

  // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
  return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
}

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
  path: "/dashboard",
  children: [
    {
      path: "*",
      action: dashboardAction,
      Component() {
        // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
        // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
        // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
        return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
      },
    },
  ],
});

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Router>
    </div>
  );
}

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes
  • Catch and bubble errors thrown when trying to unwrap responses from loader/action functions (#​11061)
  • Fix relative="path" issue when rendering Link/NavLink outside of matched routes (#​11062)

v1.13.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v1.13.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with resolveTo in splat routes (#​11045)
    • This is a follow up to #​10983 to handle the few other code paths using getPathContributingMatches
    • This removes the UNSAFE_getPathContributingMatches export from @remix-run/router since we no longer need this in the react-router/react-router-dom layers
  • Do not revalidate unmounted fetchers when v7_fetcherPersist is enabled (#​11044)

v1.12.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_flushSync option to router.navigate and router.fetch to tell the React Router layer to opt-out of React.startTransition and into ReactDOM.flushSync for state updates (#​11005)
Patch Changes

  • Fix relative="path" bug where relative path calculations started from the full location pathname, instead of from the current contextual route pathname. (#​11006)

    <Route path="/a">
  <Route path="/b" element={<Component />}>
    <Route path="/c" />
  </Route>
</Route>;

function Component() {
  return (
    <>
      {/* This is now correctly relative to /a/b, not /a/b/c */}
      <Link to=".." relative="path" />
      <Outlet />
    </>
  );
}
remix-run/react-router (react-router)

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with route.lazy not working correctly on initial SPA load when v7_partialHydration is specified (#​11121)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Routes>
    </div>
  );
}

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
function DashboardTeam() {
  // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
  return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;

  // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
  return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
}

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
  path: "/dashboard",
  children: [
    {
      path: "*",
      action: dashboardAction,
      Component() {
        // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
        // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
        // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
        return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
      },
    },
  ],
});

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Router>
    </div>
  );
}

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with resolveTo in splat routes (#​11045)
    • This is a follow up to #​10983 to handle the few other code paths using getPathContributingMatches
    • This removes the UNSAFE_getPathContributingMatches export from @remix-run/router since we no longer need this in the react-router/react-router-dom layers
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.19.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_flushSync option to useNavigate/useSumbit/fetcher.load/fetcher.submit to opt-out of React.startTransition and into ReactDOM.flushSync for state updates (#​11005)
  • Remove the unstable_ prefix from the useBlocker hook as it's been in use for enough time that we are confident in the API. We do not plan to remove the prefix from unstable_usePrompt due to differences in how browsers handle window.confirm that prevent React Router from guaranteeing consistent/correct behavior. (#​10991)
Patch Changes

  • Fix useActionData so it returns proper contextual action data and not any action data in the tree (#​11023)

  • Fix bug in useResolvedPath that would cause useResolvedPath(".") in a splat route to lose the splat portion of the URL path. (#​10983)

    • ⚠️ This fixes a quite long-standing bug specifically for "." paths inside a splat route which incorrectly dropped the splat portion of the URL. If you are relative routing via "." inside a splat route in your application you should double check that your logic is not relying on this buggy behavior and update accordingly.

  • Updated dependencies:

v6.18.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix the future prop on BrowserRouter, HashRouter and MemoryRouter so that it accepts a Partial<FutureConfig> instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#​10962)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.17.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix RouterProvider future prop type to be a Partial<FutureConfig> so that not all flags must be specified (#​10900)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.16.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • In order to move towards stricter TypeScript support in the future, we're aiming to replace current usages of any with unknown on exposed typings for user-provided data. To do this in Remix v2 without introducing breaking changes in React Router v6, we have added generics to a number of shared types. These continue to default to any in React Router and are overridden with unknown in Remix. In React Router v7 we plan to move these to unknown as a breaking change. (#​10843)
    • Location now accepts a generic for the location.state value
    • ActionFunctionArgs/ActionFunction/LoaderFunctionArgs/LoaderFunction now accept a generic for the context parameter (only used in SSR usages via createStaticHandler)
    • The return type of useMatches (now exported as UIMatch) accepts generics for match.data and match.handle - both of which were already set to unknown
  • Move the @private class export ErrorResponse to an UNSAFE_ErrorResponseImpl export since it is an implementation detail and there should be no construction of ErrorResponse instances in userland. This frees us up to export a type ErrorResponse which correlates to an instance of the class via InstanceType. Userland code should only ever be using ErrorResponse as a type and should be type-narrowing via isRouteErrorResponse. (#​10811)
  • Export ShouldRevalidateFunctionArgs interface (#​10797)
  • Removed private/internal APIs only required for the Remix v1 backwards compatibility layer and no longer needed in Remix v2 (_isFetchActionRedirect, _hasFetcherDoneAnything) (#​10715)
Patch Changes

v6.15.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add's a new redirectDocument() function which allows users to specify that a redirect from a loader/action should trigger a document reload (via window.location) instead of attempting to navigate to the redirected location via React Router (#​10705)
Patch Changes
  • Ensure useRevalidator is referentially stable across re-renders if revalidations are not actively occurring (#​10707)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.14.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.14.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix loop in unstable_useBlocker when used with an unstable blocker function (#​10652)
  • Fix issues with reused blockers on subsequent navigations (#​10656)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.14.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Strip basename from locations provided to unstable_useBlocker functions to match useLocation (#​10573)
  • Fix generatePath when passed a numeric 0 value parameter (#​10612)
  • Fix unstable_useBlocker key issues in StrictMode (#​10573)
  • Fix tsc --skipLibCheck:false issues on React 17 (#​10622)
  • Upgrade typescript to 5.1 (#​10581)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.13.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Move React.startTransition usage behind a future flag to avoid issues with existing incompatible Suspense usages. We recommend folks adopting this flag to be better compatible with React concurrent mode, but if you run into issues you can continue without the use of startTransition until v7. Issues usually boils down to creating net-new promises during the render cycle, so if you run into issues you should either lift your promise creation out of the render cycle or put it behind a useMemo. (#​10596)

    Existing behavior will no longer include React.startTransition:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>{/*...*/}</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

<RouterProvider router={router} />

    If you wish to enable React.startTransition, pass the future flag to your component:

    <BrowserRouter future={{ v7_startTransition: true }}>
  <Routes>{/*...*/}</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

<RouterProvider router={router} future={{ v7_startTransition: true }}/>
Patch Changes
  • Work around webpack/terser React.startTransition minification bug in production mode (#​10588)

v6.12.1

Compare Source

Warning
Please use version 6.13.0 or later instead of 6.12.1. This version suffers from a webpack/terser minification issue resulting in invalid minified code in your resulting production bundles which can cause issues in your application. See #​10579 for more details.

Patch Changes
  • Adjust feature detection of React.startTransition to fix webpack + react 17 compilation error (#​10569)

v6.12.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Wrap internal router state updates with React.startTransition if it exists (#​10438)
Patch Changes

v6.11.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix basename duplication in descendant <Routes> inside a <RouterProvider> (#​10492)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.11.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix usage of Component API within descendant <Routes> (#​10434)
  • Fix bug when calling useNavigate from <Routes> inside a <RouterProvider> (#​10432)
  • Fix usage of <Navigate> in strict mode when using a data router (#​10435)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.11.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Log loader/action errors to the console in dev for easier stack trace evaluation (#​10286)
  • Fix bug preventing rendering of descendant <Routes> when RouterProvider errors existed (#​10374)
  • Fix inadvertent re-renders when using Component instead of element on a route definition (#​10287)
  • Fix detection of useNavigate in the render cycle by setting the activeRef in a layout effect, allowing the navigate function to be passed to child components and called in a useEffect there. (#​10394)
  • Switched from useSyncExternalStore to useState for internal @remix-run/router router state syncing in <RouterProvider>. We found some subtle bugs where router state updates got propagated before other normal useState updates, which could lead to footguns in useEffect calls. (#​10377, #​10409)
  • Allow useRevalidator() to resolve a loader-driven error boundary scenario (#​10369)
  • Avoid unnecessary unsubscribe/resubscribes on router state changes (#​10409)
  • When using a RouterProvider, useNavigate/useSubmit/fetcher.submit are now stable across location changes, since we can handle relative routing via the @remix-run/router instance and get rid of our dependence on useLocation(). When using BrowserRouter, these hooks remain unstable across location changes because they still rely on useLocation(). (#​10336)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.10.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Added support for Future Flags in React Router. The first flag being introduced is future.v7_normalizeFormMethod which will normalize the exposed useNavigation()/useFetcher() formMethod fields as uppercase HTTP methods to align with the fetch() behavior. (#​10207)

    • When future.v7_normalizeFormMethod === false (default v6 behavior),
      • useNavigation().formMethod is lowercase
      • useFetcher().formMethod is lowercase
    • When future.v7_normalizeFormMethod === true:
      • useNavigation().formMethod is uppercase
      • useFetcher().formMethod is uppercase
Patch Changes
  • Fix route ID generation when using Fragments in createRoutesFromElements (#​10193)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.9.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • React Router now supports an alternative way to define your route element and errorElement fields as React Components instead of React Elements. You can instead pass a React Component to the new Component and ErrorBoundary fields if you choose. There is no functional difference between the two, so use whichever approach you prefer 😀. You shouldn't be defining both, but if you do Component/ErrorBoundary will "win". (#​10045)

    Example JSON Syntax

    // Both of these work the same:
const elementRoutes = [{
  path: '/',
  element: <Home />,
  errorElement: <HomeError />,
}]

const componentRoutes = [{
  path: '/',
  Component: Home,
  ErrorBoundary: HomeError,
}]

function Home() { ... }
function HomeError() { ... }

    Example JSX Syntax

    // Both of these work the same:
const elementRoutes = createRoutesFromElements(
  <Route path='/' element={<Home />} errorElement={<HomeError /> } />
);

const componentRoutes = createRoutesFromElements(
  <Route path='/' Component={Home} ErrorBoundary={HomeError} />
);

function Home() { ... }
function HomeError() { ... }

  • Introducing Lazy Route Modules! (#​10045)

    In order to keep your application bundles small and support code-splitting of your routes, we've introduced a new lazy() route property. This is an async function that resolves the non-route-matching portions of your route definition (loader, action, element/Component, errorElement/ErrorBoundary, shouldRevalidate, handle).

    Lazy routes are resolved on initial load and during the loading or submitting phase of a navigation or fetcher call. You cannot lazily define route-matching properties (path, index, children) since we only execute your lazy route functions after we've matched known routes.

    Your lazy functions will typically return the result of a dynamic import.

    // In this example, we assume most folks land on the homepage so we include that
// in our critical-path bundle, but then we lazily load modules for /a and /b so
// they don't load until the user navigates to those routes
let routes = createRoutesFromElements(
  <Route path="/" element={<Layout />}>
    <Route index element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="a" lazy={() => import("./a")} />
    <Route path="b" lazy={() => import("./b")} />
  </Route>
);

    Then in your lazy route modules, export the properties you want defined for the route:

    export async function loader({ request }) {
  let data = await fetchData(request);
  return json(data);
}

// Export a `Component` directly instead of needing to create a React Element from it
export function Component() {
  let data = useLoaderData();

  return (
    <>
      <h1>You made it!</h1>
      <p>{data}</p>
    </>
  );
}

// Export an `ErrorBoundary` directly instead of needing to create a React Element from it
export function ErrorBoundary() {
  let error = useRouteError();
  return isRouteErrorResponse(error) ? (
    <h1>
      {error.status} {error.statusText}
    </h1>
  ) : (
    <h1>{error.message || error}</h1>
  );
}

    An example of this in action can be found in the examples/lazy-loading-router-provider directory of the repository.

    🙌 Huge thanks to @​rossipedia for the Initial Proposal and POC Implementation.

  • Updated dependencies:

Patch Changes
  • Fix generatePath incorrectly applying parameters in some cases (#​10078)
  • Improve memoization for context providers to avoid unnecessary re-renders (#​9983)

v6.8.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.8.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Remove inaccurate console warning for POP navigations and update active blocker logic (#​10030)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.8.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.7.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_useBlocker hook for blocking navigations within the app's location origin (#​9709)
Patch Changes
  • Fix generatePath when optional params are present (#​9764)
  • Update <Await> to accept ReactNode as children function return result (#​9896)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.6.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Ensure useId consistency during SSR (#​9805)

v6.6.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.6.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.5.0

Compare Source

This release introduces support for Optional Route Segments. Now, adding a ? to the end of any path segment will make that entire segment optional. This works for both static segments and dynamic parameters.

Optional Params Examples

  • <Route path=":lang?/about> will match:
    • /:lang/about
    • /about
  • <Route path="/multistep/:widget1?/widget2?/widget3?"> will match:
    • /multistep
    • /multistep/:widget1
    • /multistep/:widget1/:widget2
    • /multistep/:widget1/:widget2/:widget3

Optional Static Segment Example

  • <Route path="/home?"> will match:
    • /
    • /home
  • <Route path="/fr?/about"> will match:
    • /about
    • /fr/about
Minor Changes
  • Allows optional routes and optional static segments (#​9650)
Patch Changes
  • Stop incorrectly matching on partial named parameters, i.e. <Route path="prefix-:param">, to align with how splat parameters work. If you were previously relying on this behavior then it's recommended to extract the static portion of the path at the useParams call site: (#​9506)
// Old behavior at URL /prefix-123
<Route path="prefix-:id" element={<Comp /> }>

function Comp() {
  let params = useParams(); // { id: '123' }
  let id = params.id; // "123"
  ...
}

// New behavior at URL /prefix-123
<Route path=":id" element={<Comp /> }>

function Comp() {
  let params = useParams(); // { id: 'prefix-123' }
  let id = params.id.replace(/^prefix-/, ''); // "123"
  ...
}

v6.4.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.4.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.4.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • useRoutes should be able to return null when passing locationArg (#​9485)
  • fix initialEntries type in createMemoryRouter (#​9498)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.4.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix IndexRouteObject and NonIndexRouteObject types to make hasErrorElement optional (#​9394)
  • Enhance console error messages for invalid usage of data router hooks (#​9311)
  • If an index route has children, it will result in a runtime error. We have strengthened our RouteObject/RouteProps types to surface the error in TypeScript. (#​9366)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.4.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.4.0

Compare Source

Whoa this is a big one! 6.4.0 brings all the data loading and mutation APIs over from Remix. Here's a quick high level overview, but it's recommended you go check out the docs, especially the feature overview and the tutorial.

New APIs

  • Create your router with createMemoryRouter
  • Render your router with <RouterProvider>
  • Load data with a Route loader and mutate with a Route action
  • Handle errors with Route errorElement
  • Defer non-critical data with defer and Await

Bug Fixes

  • Path resolution is now trailing slash agnostic (#​8861)
  • useLocation returns the scoped location inside a <Routes location> component (#​9094)

Updated Dependencies

v6.3.0: [email protected]

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: remix-run/react-router@v6.2.2...v6.3.0

v6.2.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

🐛 Bug Fixes
  • Fixed nested splat routes that begin with special URL-safe characters (#​8563)
  • Fixed a bug where index routes were missing route context in some cases (#​8497)

New Contributors

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team as code owners January 23, 2024 18:10
@renovate renovate bot removed the request for review from a team January 23, 2024 18:10
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from academo January 23, 2024 18:10
@renovate renovate bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file no-changelog Skip including change in changelog/release notes labels Jan 23, 2024
@grafana-delivery-bot grafana-delivery-bot bot added this to the 10.4.x milestone Jan 23, 2024
@ashharrison90 ashharrison90 modified the milestone: 10.4.x Jan 24, 2024
ashharrison90
ashharrison90 approved these changes Jan 24, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ashharrison90 ashharrison90 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm bot 🤖

@ashharrison90 ashharrison90 merged commit ad75542 into main Jan 24, 2024
22 checks passed
@ashharrison90 ashharrison90 deleted the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch January 24, 2024 09:22
@aangelisc aangelisc modified the milestones: 10.4.x, 10.4.0 Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ashharrison90 ashharrison90 ashharrison90 approved these changes

@academo academo Awaiting requested review from academo academo is a code owner automatically assigned from grafana/frontend-ops

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/frontend datasource/Tempo dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file no-changelog Skip including change in changelog/release notes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
10.4.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ashharrison90 @aangelisc