Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design issues #2

Open
14 tasks done
vv-monsalve opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 14 comments
Open
14 tasks done

Design issues #2

vv-monsalve opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 14 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor

vv-monsalve commented Jun 30, 2021

Google Fonts Latin Plus coverage

  • Design all the glyphs required in the GF Latin Plus encoding
  • Create all the comb marks as mentioned below
  • Leave only the compound glyphs (e.g. adblgrave) marked in dark grey as pending to be created using the components

Diacritics

  • Please ensure the definitive design is adjusted in the combining marks, so they will be ready to create the compound glyphs.
  • Once the definitive design is ensured in the comb marks Legacy marks, delete the legacy marks and add them back so they are made using the comb marks as components.
  • Diacritics need to be balanced (in weight, size, contrast) and matching the style of the typeface design.
  • Adjust the vertical position using glyphs app locked guidelines.
  • Ensure related marks are consistent between them, e.g. caron and circumflex
  • Caron.alt need to have the alternate shape used in Ľ Slovak On page 30 of this document you can find detailed info around the vertical Caron.
  • Leave a 0 sidebearings value for the marks

Screen Shot 2021-06-29 at 13 03 55
Screen Shot 2021-06-29 at 13 04 48


Glyphs

  • The ampersand and Eng need to be consistent (in size and style) with the font. See RUSerius as reference
  • The German Double SS need to be fixed. This article is a good reference
    Screen Shot 2021-06-29 at 21 02 59
  • one.superior twosuperior threeesuperior foursuperior` need to be fixed
    Screen Shot 2021-06-29 at 21 04 35
    Screen Shot 2021-06-29 at 21 04 48
  • paragraph needs to be scaled down
    Screen Shot 2021-06-29 at 21 29 25
@RobLeuschke
Copy link

All assignments have been completed!

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @RobLeuschke, I've pulled the latest file in dropbox.

Screen Shot 2021-07-01 at 08 48 09

The `superior` numbers are too big still. While scaling down proportionally the original figures is a valid starting point they would need some adjustments after it to (a) avoid having nodes with fractional values or position, and (b) to avoid inconsistency in the stem thickness or typographic color. E.g.

Screen Shot 2021-07-01 at 08 54 41

Please adjust them.

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

Better?
image

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

Better?

Better, although they still look a little bit big. It would depend on the design and designer but on average they tend to be ~65 to 75% of the x-height. Right now they still look almost as big as the n.

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

I have reduced the size more and added a bit more weight.
image

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

RobLeuschke commented Jul 2, 2021

I believe I have covered all of the issues that were brought to my attention.
image

Cherish is now ready for the next stage of completion.

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

vv-monsalve commented Aug 3, 2021

Hi @RobLeuschke, as reported by Nhung there are still some Design issues to solve in Cherish. I pushed an updated Cherish.glyphs file in DropBox with the latest changes performed on our part so that you can take over the pending issues, which mainly are:

  • Overall pacing issues. There are some kerning pairs between e.g. one o but not the others. At the same time, many of the kerning pairs present in the font could be avoided by improving the space. The sidebearing arithmetic in Glyphs App is of great help to do this, as well as creating Kerning groups.
  • Some symbols need to be adjusted
  • ordfemenine and ordmasculine need to be fixed

Screen Shot 2021-08-02 at 19 26 03

Screen Shot 2021-08-02 at 19 27 23

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

Anomalies in the spacing of numerals have revised.

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

@RobLeuschke These are the images we reviewed when inspecting spacin/kerning + connections issues. Please keep in mind all that we've talked about. Thanks

Spacin & kerning
Screen Shot 2021-08-03 at 21 13 22
Screen Shot 2021-08-03 at 21 13 53
Screen Shot 2021-08-03 at 21 14 00
Screen Shot 2021-08-04 at 9 22 44


Connections

  • connections between co oc on 'ou or` among others

Screen Shot 2021-08-04 at 9 07 27

Screen Shot 2021-08-04 at 9 20 03

Screen Shot 2021-08-04 at 9 22 29

Screen Shot 2021-08-04 at 16 25 16

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

As we've talked about when reviewing the superior numbers, the ordfeminine and ordmasculine, scaling the original shapes is a good starting point, but the stroke and proportions need to be adjusted

Screen Shot 2021-08-03 at 21 17 15

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

@RobLeuschke Let me know how are you coming with these fixes for Cherish. Thanks

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

My apologies! I had made the changes, but didn't realize I had made them in my copy on my desktop and not in the live Dropbox.

The ordinals have been heavied up.
image

Some of the lowercase connectors have been modified to better connections:
image

In addition, I have cleaned up some of the capitals to connect better to lowercase.
image

I created a C.calt from the original form. The newer connecting C is now in the base character/glyph cell.

Please let me know if you need anything else.

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

RobLeuschke commented Aug 12, 2021 via email

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done!

Thanks for the improvements! I'll look for the latest file now :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants