Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design Issues #1

Open
17 tasks done
vv-monsalve opened this issue Nov 23, 2021 · 7 comments
Open
17 tasks done

Design Issues #1

vv-monsalve opened this issue Nov 23, 2021 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor

vv-monsalve commented Nov 23, 2021

Google Fonts Latin Core & Plus coverage

  • Design all the glyphs required both in the Latin Core + GF Latin Plus encoding
  • Create all the comb marks as mentioned below
  • Leave only the compound glyphs (e.g. adblgrave) marked in dark grey as pending to be created using the components

Diacritics

  • Please ensure the definitive design is adjusted in the combining marks, so they will be ready to create the compound glyphs.
  • Once the definitive design is ensured in the comb marks Legacy marks, delete the legacy marks and add them back so they are made using the comb marks as components.
  • Diacritics need to be balanced (in weight, size, contrast) and match the style of the typeface design.
  • Adjust the vertical position using glyphs app locked guidelines.
  • Ensure related marks are consistent between them, e.g. caron and circumflex
  • Caron.alt need to have the alternate shape used in Ľ Slovak On page 30 of this document you can find detailed info around the vertical Caron.
  • Leave a 0 sidebearings value for the marks

Glyphs

  • The ampersand and Eng need to be consistent (in size and style) with the font. See RUSerius as reference
  • The German Double SS need to be fixed. This article is a good reference
  • Currency symbols are related to the overall design and have balanced proportions
  • ordfeminine and ordmasculine as well as superior numbers are well proportioned and with a balanced stem thickness. Issue of reference
  • fractions and superior numerals have a good proportion + weight. Issue of reference

Spacing

  • Inspect the spacing and kerning of the font to ensure it is working properly and most common cases are covered. Issue of reference
  • Terminal forms spacing should avoid crashes or collisions. Issue of reference
@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @RobLeuschke, I'm creating the Design Issue just to confirm everything was covered in the file.

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

This is ready!

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @RobLeuschke, Alumni Sans Inline is technically ready to go. However, after creating some proof images the inline effect is barely visible even at 36pt. What is the intended point size of use for it? Would you like to make any changes to it?

OS X High Sierra Safari_11
Desktop_OS_X_High_Sierra_safari_11 1_
Windows 10 Chrome_71
Desktop_Windows_10_chrome_71 0_
Windows 10 Edge_18
Desktop_Windows_10_edge_18 0_

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

RobLeuschke commented Dec 8, 2021 via email

@vv-monsalve
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am a bit under the weather (American colloquialism for "I am not feeling
well") with a bad cold, so I haven't been working lately.

Sorry to hear that. I'm feeling the same here, but trying to get the Batch 4 finished this year.

Did you see my question about separating American Calligraphic Titling from the Pro version?

I haven't been able to inspect this yet as we are focused now on solving all the related issues for the Alumni set of sibling families, as the priority now is to finish and publish Batch 4.
I'll inspect that as soon as we move ahead with the Alumni Cases.

Pinstripe version.... it is really a display font to be used at large sizes
for print or used at extremely large sizes on the web. So, no, I don't wish
to make any changes.

The question was about the Inline version. As you can see in the preview images above the effect is not going to be visible in Safari even at sizes like 36 pt, so probably it wouldn't be noticeable in the preview sample in the Google Fonts Catalog.
Perhaps we should validate this with @davelab6

@RobLeuschke
Copy link

RobLeuschke commented Dec 8, 2021 via email

@davelab6
Copy link
Member

davelab6 commented Dec 8, 2021

The catalog design will evolve over time, so I'm OK for this to move ahead, but the description should tell users what is going on. Eg, "This typeface is designed to be used above 32pt in print (assuming 300 dpi) and above 64px in digital media."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants