docs: Describe shortcomings.

[dopiera]

The description only lists the large ones.

---

This change is 

[kamirr]

Only the last comment is blocking.

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @dopiera)

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2403 at r1 (raw file):

irrespective of whether they were intentional or unintentional.

### Lack of Network Decentralization

Centralized solutions have inherent benefits that decentralized implementation's can't have. Discovery is orders of magnitude faster, NAT holepunching is not always reliable, etc. I'm not sure if it's worth pointing out here though.

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2427 at r1 (raw file):

This separation could potentially allow the reuse of
[libp2p](https://libp2p.io/) for the first two layers, reducing the need for

There has been an attempt on porting yagna to libp2p, but I've no idea whether the findings were listed anywhere. You can try asking Witek about it -- maybe it could shed some more light on this issue.

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2456 at r1 (raw file):

supply over request volume.

### Limited Offer Query Language

I don't like LDAP at all, but is it actually insufficient in real use-cases? If you have an example maybe you could add it here.

[dopiera]

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @kamirr)

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2403 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, kamirr (Kamil Koczurek) wrote…

Centralized solutions have inherent benefits that decentralized implementation's can't have. Discovery is orders of magnitude faster, NAT holepunching is not always reliable, etc. I'm not sure if it's worth pointing out here though.

Right, but decentralization is a requirement for us. Let me state this more clearly.

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2427 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, kamirr (Kamil Koczurek) wrote…

There has been an attempt on porting yagna to libp2p, but I've no idea whether the findings were listed anywhere. You can try asking Witek about it -- maybe it could shed some more light on this issue.

We chatted briefly. Clearly there are pros and cons but I have not seen a comprehensive list of both. Do you think this point needs to be amended somehow?

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2456 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, kamirr (Kamil Koczurek) wrote…

I don't like LDAP at all, but is it actually insufficient in real use-cases? If you have an example maybe you could add it here.

PTAL.

[kamirr]

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @dopiera)

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2403 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dopiera (Marek Dopiera) wrote…

Right, but decentralization is a requirement for us. Let me state this more clearly.

lgtm

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2427 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dopiera (Marek Dopiera) wrote…

We chatted briefly. Clearly there are pros and cons but I have not seen a comprehensive list of both. Do you think this point needs to be amended somehow?

No, if there's no comprehensive list then it's fine to keep this point as it is

---

arch-snapshot/arch.md line 2456 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, dopiera (Marek Dopiera) wrote…

PTAL.

lgtm, thanks