Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execute Goblint in incremental mode #5

Closed
sim642 opened this issue Sep 29, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7
Closed

Execute Goblint in incremental mode #5

sim642 opened this issue Sep 29, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sim642
Copy link
Member

sim642 commented Sep 29, 2021

After goblint/analyzer#358 it's possible to use Goblint's incremental analysis directly, so the plugin should do that using the incremental.load and incremental.save options.

Another possibility might be to not force GobPie to run Goblint with those options itself, but just require that the user enable them via #2 themselves. That would allow using the plugin both incrementally and non-incrementally without implementing anything. On the downside, if the user forgets to enable incremental in the conf file, all the analysis will be non-incremental by default, which will be silently slower than expected.

@sim642 sim642 added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 29, 2021
karoliineh added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2021
…le in the project. #2

Analysis is now triggered on a file when the file gets opened in the IDE (in additon to triggering the analysis when the file is saved). Extension works with incremental.json conf file configuration, closes #5 (incremental.json conf is now used in the DemoProject as well).
@karoliineh karoliineh linked a pull request Oct 14, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants