-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[gitpod-db] add index on workspaceDB.Type
Column
#8858
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
For Telemetry queries to be less intensive on the CPU, We need to build Indexes to make the querying faster Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati <[email protected]>
geropl
reviewed
Mar 17, 2022
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ export class DBWorkspace implements Workspace { | |||
}) | |||
shareable?: boolean; | |||
|
|||
@Index("ind_type") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
geropl
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested and works as expected 👍
roboquat
added
deployed: webapp
Meta team change is running in production
deployed
Change is completely running in production
labels
Mar 18, 2022
Pothulapati
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2022
#8617 disabled the telemetry fields as those database queries were causing heavy CPU performance. #8858 fixed that issue by adding indexes for those queries. This PR also adds tracing for the telemetry data provider so that we can also count how long they take usually, and how frequently these are called. Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati <[email protected]>
Pothulapati
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2022
#8617 disabled the telemetry fields as those database queries were causing heavy CPU performance. #8858 fixed that issue by adding indexes for those queries. This PR also adds tracing for the telemetry data provider so that we can also count how long they take usually, and how frequently these are called. Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati <[email protected]>
Pothulapati
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2022
#8617 disabled the telemetry fields as those database queries were causing heavy CPU performance. #8858 fixed that issue by adding indexes for those queries. This PR also adds tracing for the telemetry data provider so that we can also count how long they take usually, and how frequently these are called. Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati <[email protected]>
Pothulapati
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2022
#8617 disabled the telemetry fields as those database queries were causing heavy CPU performance. #8858 fixed that issue by adding indexes for those queries. This PR also adds tracing for the telemetry data provider so that we can also count how long they take usually, and how frequently these are called. Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati <[email protected]>
Pothulapati
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2022
#8617 disabled the telemetry fields as those database queries were causing heavy CPU performance. #8858 fixed that issue by adding indexes for those queries. This PR also adds tracing for the telemetry data provider so that we can also count how long they take usually, and how frequently these are called. Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati <[email protected]>
roboquat
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2022
#8617 disabled the telemetry fields as those database queries were causing heavy CPU performance. #8858 fixed that issue by adding indexes for those queries. This PR also adds tracing for the telemetry data provider so that we can also count how long they take usually, and how frequently these are called. Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati <[email protected]>
Pothulapati
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2022
#8617 disabled the telemetry fields as those database queries were causing heavy CPU performance. #8858 fixed that issue by adding indexes for those queries. This PR also adds tracing for the telemetry data provider so that we can also count how long they take usually, and how frequently these are called. Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati <[email protected]>
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
deployed: webapp
Meta team change is running in production
deployed
Change is completely running in production
release-note
size/S
team: webapp
Issue belongs to the WebApp team
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
For Telemetry queries to be less intensive on the CPU, We need to
build Indexes to make the querying faster. This PR creates
a index on the
type
column for theworkspaceDB
aswe filter on
type=='regular'
Signed-off-by: Tarun Pothulapati [email protected]
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #8638
How to test
After creating the index on prod, The query seems to be faster
Release Notes
Documentation