-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Documentation: s/Guy/Dev #48
Open
goldfirere
wants to merge
9
commits into
ghc:ghc-8.8
Choose a base branch
from
goldfirere:ghc-8.8
base: ghc-8.8
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Note: I noticed some overlap with #1112 from @wygulmage and #1081 from @parsonsmatt after creating these proposed changes - mea culpa for not looking at the open PRs sooner.
The current formatting of the missing link destination does not really help user to understand the reasons of the missing link. To address this, I've changed the formatting in two ways: - the missing link symbol name is now fully qualified. This way you immediately know which haskell module cannot be linked. It is then easier to understand why this module does not have documentation (hidden module or broken documentation). - one line per missing link, that's more readable now that symbol name can be longer due to qualification. For example, before haddock was listing missing symbol such as: ``` could not find link destinations for: Word8 Word16 mapMaybe ``` Now it is listed as: ``` could not find link destinations for: - Data.Word.Word8 - Data.Word.Word16 - Data.Maybe.mapMaybe ```
This argument can be used multiples time. A missing link to a symbol listed by `--ignore-link-symbol` won't trigger "missing link" warning.
This is an easy way to remove a reference to a gendered noun.
:( I have no idea what those other commits are. And I don't know which branch this should be against. But I'm sure you get the idea. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While reading the Haddock docs recently, I realized that there is no need for the gendered "Guy" when the neutral "Dev" would do.