-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix build break by iq1s #6010
fix build break by iq1s #6010
Conversation
return d * sumi; | ||
int sumi1 = 0, sumi2 = 0, sumi3 = 0, sumi4 = 0; | ||
const uint8_t h1 = bq1->scales[2*ib32+0]; | ||
const uint8_t h2 = bq1->scales[2*ib32+1]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
const uint8_t h2 = bq1->scales[2*ib32+1]; | |
const uint8_t h2 = bq1->qh[2*ib32+1]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I restore the structure with "scales"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should not restore scales
- the data structure was changed to improve the quality of IQ1_S
. The kernels should be adapted to follow the CUDA implementation
Does this even pass the tests when you run test-backend-ops
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, it can pass with CI in my local test.
But, I want to abandon this PR. base is changed more frequently. :<
We need to fix the SYCL backend build as soon.
Follow CUDA code is not important, if SYCL backend work well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, if you want, you can close the PR
Make sure to take a look at #6014 when you get to this
I'd like to restore SYCL backend build as soon as possible. |
abandon due to this issue has been fixed by other PR. |
fix the build break issue created by "Add q3_s and q1_s"