-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Max and Min function to Vector2.hh #133
Conversation
@mjcarroll should I add these functions to the |
Yes please, I'll leave it up to you if you want to do it here or in a follow-up. |
I'll do it here. By the way, once the PR #123 was merged, I need to update my branch to continue with this PR, right? Thanks! |
@chapulina Did you deleted some comment? I received an e-mail with your comment but I can't see it here 😕 |
haha yeah I did, I thought I was commenting on #139 but I had the wrong tab open. I was hoping no one had seen it 😅 |
Yes, you can either merge |
@pxalcantara friendly ping |
Sorry @mjcarroll I've been a little busy, but I gonna finish this today 🙈 |
c0170c0
to
7b28df5
Compare
@mjcarroll done, again, sorry for the delay! 😉 |
@mjcarroll I forgot to add the tests to .rb file. How I run just the Vector2_TEST.rb to check if the test that I'm doing is correct? |
You should be able to go to the build directory and filter it with
|
@luccosta Maybe worth add this information at the documentation that you're doing about the Ruby tests |
It's already there :) but without |
7b28df5
to
d3260e4
Compare
@mjcarroll I'm facing some problems doing the test at Vector2.br
I've already added these functions to Vector2.i. Could you help me and show what I'm doing wrong? |
Yep! First a note that the three When I check out your branch, everything looks to pass for me locally:
Maybe once #139 lands, we can rebase this and see how it looks in Github Actions? There are obviously inconsistencies between our two systems if we are getting different results like this. |
So, as far as I understood, my code is correct, so I can continue to implement the test in the Ruby file, right? @mjcarroll @chapulina |
Yes, it currently works fine for me, feel free to continue @pxalcantara |
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: pxalcantara <[email protected]>
58b69e9
to
9de450c
Compare
@mjcarroll @chapulina Apparently there is a problem with my system because this test continuos to break but, once it passed the CI check here, that's what mater. Sorry for the PR take so long but I think now is finished, right? Or do you wanna me to do more changes? |
Passing CI is sufficient for me! |
Solved issue #71
Functions added to solved the issue mentioned above, there was implemented:
These functions were based on the functions with the same name at Vector3.hh