-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pose addition and subtraction needs work [gazebo issue 216] #60
Comments
Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig). I think we can make that switch. There might be repercussions in our code that are difficult to debug. If you do make this switch, then you might want to make sure all Ignition libraries pass CI. |
Original comment by Michael Grey (Bitbucket: mxgrey, GitHub: mxgrey). We currently don't use I fully agree with removing |
Original comment by Steve Peters (Bitbucket: Steven Peters, GitHub: scpeters). Yeah, it's really confusing that the
|
I think this has been fixed (unfortunately with breaking change in the behavior of |
I think there's still the question of whether we want to remove the addition and subtraction operators: |
yeah, I would support deprecating them to encourage the use of |
I personally agree. |
I'll open a pull request to deprecate the |
The * operator matches the behavior of multiplying transform matrices, so it should be preferred over the addition operator, which is confusing. Part of gazebosim#60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
The * operator matches the behavior of multiplying transform matrices, so it should be preferred over the addition operator, which is confusing. Part of gazebosim#60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
The * operator matches the behavior of multiplying transform matrices, so it should be preferred over the addition operator, which is confusing. Part of gazebosim#60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
The * operator matches the behavior of multiplying transform matrices, so it should be preferred over the addition operator, which is confusing. Part of gazebosim#60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
The * operator matches the behavior of multiplying transform matrices, so it should be preferred over the addition operator, which is confusing. Part of gazebosim#60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
The * operator matches the behavior of multiplying transform matrices, so it should be preferred over the addition operator, which is confusing. Part of gazebosim#60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
The * operator matches the behavior of multiplying transform matrices, so it should be preferred over the addition operator, which is confusing. Part of #60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
Part of #60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
Part of #60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
Part of #60. Signed-off-by: Steve Peters <[email protected]>
Pose |
Original report (archived issue) by Louise Poubel (Bitbucket: chapulina, GitHub: chapulina).
Moving Gazebo issue 216 here now that gazebo::math has been fully deprecated. Please consider the discussion on that issue:
https://bitbucket.org/osrf/gazebo/issues/216/pose-addition-and-subtraction-needs-work
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: