Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Content migration - fill out "Static Folder" stub #9222

Closed
7 tasks
amberleyromo opened this issue Oct 18, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #9287
Closed
7 tasks

Content migration - fill out "Static Folder" stub #9222

amberleyromo opened this issue Oct 18, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #9287
Labels
good first issue Issue that doesn't require previous experience with Gatsby type: documentation An issue or pull request for improving or updating Gatsby's documentation

Comments

@amberleyromo
Copy link
Contributor

amberleyromo commented Oct 18, 2018

Issue Context

This issue is part of the content migration project (#8103), which is meant to take existing content and repurpose it so it's easier to find in the docs.

Motivation

We are doing this because many people have written excellent content that we want to canonize and maintain so more people can find it and benefit from it.

Steps to resolve this issue

Review the Gatsby docs approach

Draft the doc

Open a pull request

@amberleyromo amberleyromo added type: documentation An issue or pull request for improving or updating Gatsby's documentation Hacktoberfest good first issue Issue that doesn't require previous experience with Gatsby labels Oct 18, 2018
@thatfiredev
Copy link
Contributor

@amberleyromo I'd gladly take this one :)

@amberleyromo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rosariopfernandes great! thanks so much! Marking as claimed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Issue that doesn't require previous experience with Gatsby type: documentation An issue or pull request for improving or updating Gatsby's documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants