STRWEB-110 ignore order of CSS imports #141
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add
@folio/consortia-settings
to a platform build generates tens of thousands of lines of warnings form mini-css-extract-plugin about its inability to determine what order to assemble its CSS rules in because different files have the imports in a different order.It seems likely we don't have to worry about this since per-module CSS will be scoped to that module by postcss, and shared CSS will just be in stripes-components, but this could be riskier than I realize, and a better approach may be to try to figure out what is happening in
@folio/consortia-settings
that is different than every other module we've added to the platform so far.Refs STRWEB-110