This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Inject user identifier to ExecutionSpec #549
Inject user identifier to ExecutionSpec #549
Changes from 8 commits
751c6e1
13e25ec
ed723c1
14d5123
fa2ce4e
527ffcc
4a6b0f9
3e2b93d
19ba977
8653f4c
a64a931
fd26eb1
03af823
17a06a1
17968a7
fdec7d4
6b4ff04
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
when admin is running without auth, this still won't fail right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah UserIdentifier would just be an empty string