fixed [Docs] Spot/interruptible docs imply retries come from the user… Closes #3956

[ap0calypse8]

… retry budget #3956

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR clarifies the documentation regarding retry behavior for interruptible tasks in Flyte. It updates sections to emphasize that retries for spot/interruptible instances utilize the system retry budget rather than the user-specified retry budget. Changes are made in the user guide and related documentation files to ensure accurate guidance for users managing task retries on preemptible compute resources.

[welcome]

Thank you for opening this pull request! 🙌

These tips will help get your PR across the finish line:

• Most of the repos have a PR template; if not, fill it out to the best of your knowledge.
• Sign off your commits (Reference: DCO Guide).

[ap0calypse8]

@neverett @ppiegaze I’ve worked on the issue and would appreciate it if you could review my changes. I'm waiting for your feedback before we can merge. Thank you!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.84%. Comparing base (553a702) to head (7f7a5a9).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5938      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.84%   36.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1309     1309              
  Lines      130967   130994      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits        48259    48268       +9     
- Misses      78524    78536      +12     
- Partials     4184     4190       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-datacatalog	51.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteadmin	54.10% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
unittests-flytecopilot	11.73% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytectl	62.40% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteidl	6.92% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteplugins	53.64% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytepropeller	43.02% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests-flytestdlib	55.41% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ap0calypse8]

I am waiting for workflow approval from maintainers @davidmirror-ops . Thanks!

[davidmirror-ops]

Next time you can also install requirements and build locally with make -c html to catch syntax errors

[ap0calypse8]

@davidmirror-ops As i have updated the syntax of the docs ....unit test flytectl failing has no relation to my commit.this test failure might be:

A flaky test
An existing issue in the master branch
An environmental issue in CI

help me out please

[davidmirror-ops]

Thank you!

[welcome]

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉

[ap0calypse8]

@davidmirror-ops thank you