You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What we're after: Move forward with the on-going work done by @rfultz, re-styled as part of the next steps to implement the updated org chart. The smaller widths will be a stacked list (single column), though we're still thinking about ways to represent the non-hierarchal relationship between the commissioners and IG (maybe two columns for them?). We'll probably lose the connecting lines for the smaller widths; still need to engineer how they'll work for the larger widths.
We're researching options to efficiently administer the information inside the CMS, keeping in mind the upcoming work for streamlining the admin for tables that are currently html blocks.
What we're after: Move forward with the on-going work done by @rfultz, re-styled as part of the next steps to implement the updated org chart. The smaller widths will be a stacked list (single column), though we're still thinking about ways to represent the non-hierarchal relationship between the commissioners and IG (maybe two columns for them?). We'll probably lose the connecting lines for the smaller widths; still need to engineer how they'll work for the larger widths.
We're researching options to efficiently administer the information inside the CMS, keeping in mind the upcoming work for streamlining the admin for tables that are currently html blocks.
Related issues
Completion criteria
Design
Future work
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: