Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HTML/responsive-side work for organizational chart #3071

Closed
3 tasks
Tracked by #138
JonellaCulmer opened this issue Jul 22, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3130
Closed
3 tasks
Tracked by #138

HTML/responsive-side work for organizational chart #3071

JonellaCulmer opened this issue Jul 22, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3130
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@JonellaCulmer
Copy link
Contributor

JonellaCulmer commented Jul 22, 2019

What we're after: Move forward with the on-going work done by @rfultz, re-styled as part of the next steps to implement the updated org chart. The smaller widths will be a stacked list (single column), though we're still thinking about ways to represent the non-hierarchal relationship between the commissioners and IG (maybe two columns for them?). We'll probably lose the connecting lines for the smaller widths; still need to engineer how they'll work for the larger widths.

We're researching options to efficiently administer the information inside the CMS, keeping in mind the upcoming work for streamlining the admin for tables that are currently html blocks.

Related issues

Completion criteria

  • Update existing work to match styling
  • Consider solution for connecting lines (possible MVP stacking columns left to right without lines)
  • Meet/discuss work with @AmyKort and design for review

Design

Organization chart

Future work

@rfultz
Copy link
Contributor

rfultz commented Aug 26, 2019

Progress update:
image

@rfultz
Copy link
Contributor

rfultz commented Aug 27, 2019

Another progress update:
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants