Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Finish up content work on candidate pages #2101

Closed
2 tasks done
llienfec opened this issue Jun 18, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Finish up content work on candidate pages #2101

llienfec opened this issue Jun 18, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@llienfec
Copy link
Contributor

llienfec commented Jun 18, 2018

Problem

Need to fix candidate committee pages, especially receipts, to be more complete.

Background

In candidate section of H4CC, we worked on identifying gaps in content moved over from campaign guides (#1995). To address these gaps, @dorothyyeager created content, whether they go on separate pages or as sections in existing ones. However, in the current content architecture - we can't find places to put the information in ways that make sense.

We keep running into this issue, and the problems are documented in our work at #1214. We especially need to make sure that all types of contributions (including joint fundraising, PAC, party, earmarks, loans, candidate contributions) are covered in these pages.

The work

To do

  • Mock up moving sections around
  • Solicit comments from content team

Future work

  • Make edits and decisions based on comments
  • Update pages as needed

References

#1214
#1995

@dorothyyeager
Copy link
Contributor

Noting this feedback received on https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/candidate-taking-receipts/who-can-and-cannot-contribute/. See fecgov/FEC#6498

There is indeed a little bit of technical detail that wasn't included but that would have answered one of his questions. It's in the glossary and actually should probably be on the page.

@dorothyyeager
Copy link
Contributor

@llienfec and I had a fantastic sync-up about this and have re-scoped the topic (see edits above) to focus our work for this sprint on coming up with a way to use the current page architecture but reorganize the content within the pages, fill in gaps (e.g., no references to PACs being able to contribute) and use the resource page template for the longer pages as a way to assist people with finding information. We're planning to circulate a document to the rest of the content team this morning for their comments, and then we can go from there to the future work.

@dorothyyeager
Copy link
Contributor

@llienfec
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing issue: new section structure and pages have been out to content team for over a week. We're going to finish collecting the comments and edit the pages. That work is tracked at #2173.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants