-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(test/libsinsp_e2e,ci): port libsinsp_e2e tests to use python3. #2073
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Federico Di Pierro <[email protected]>
/milestone 0.19.0 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2073 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 73.58% 73.58%
=======================================
Files 253 253
Lines 31867 31867
Branches 5630 5650 +20
=======================================
Hits 23449 23449
- Misses 8401 8412 +11
+ Partials 17 6 -11
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Perf diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - unit tests
Heap diff from master - scap file
Benchmarks diff from master
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
if os.path.exists(NAME): | ||
client = socket.socket( socket.AF_UNIX, socket.SOCK_STREAM ) | ||
client.connect(NAME) | ||
|
||
print "STARTED" | ||
print(STARTED) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[nitpick] A variable for two print messages is a bit overkill, don't you think?
print(STARTED) | |
print("STARTED") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is worth the amend :) actually i like it better like this; de gustibus eheh
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP, Molter73 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area CI
/area tests
Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Extracted from #2064
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: