-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 930
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(finance): rename mask to maskedNumber #2055
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #2055 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 99.61%
=======================================
Files ? 2535
Lines ? 242176
Branches ? 1290
=======================================
Hits ? 241240
Misses ? 909
Partials ? 27 |
535e07a
to
cce244e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please include this in the upgrading guide.
i dont think the upgrading guide has to mention every deprecation, only
if a method is just changed to a better name within the same module, and the deprecation workflow is used, i think its fine to just mention this as a breaking change in the v9 upgrading guide when it is actually removed. |
Not individually, but maybe as a list of renamed methods. |
@matthewmayer @ST-DDT I cannot find it right now, but I thought we have an open TODO/issue to re-evaluate the upgrading guideline in total before releasing v8.0 |
It would be good to have some guidelines on what needs to be in upgrading and what doesn't per my other comment. |
I suggest moving this into its own discussion, discord chat or even issue |
Let's make an issue |
9d1b6ed
e748555
to
9d1b6ed
Compare
references #1346 (comment)