Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: https configuration ignored for OpenShiftServer in CRUD mode #3346

Merged

Conversation

manusa
Copy link
Member

@manusa manusa commented Jul 22, 2021

Description

fix: https configuration ignored for OpenShiftServer in CRUD mode

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change
  • Chore (non-breaking change which doesn't affect codebase;
    test, version modification, documentation, etc.)

Checklist

  • Code contributed by me aligns with current project license: Apache 2.0
  • I Added CHANGELOG entry regarding this change
  • I have implemented unit tests to cover my changes
  • I have added/updated the javadocs and other documentation accordingly
  • No new bugs, code smells, etc. in SonarCloud report
  • I tested my code in Kubernetes
  • I tested my code in OpenShift

@centos-ci
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@manusa manusa requested a review from rohanKanojia July 22, 2021 08:52
@rohanKanojia rohanKanojia requested a review from shawkins July 22, 2021 09:11
@manusa manusa added this to the 5.7.0 milestone Jul 22, 2021
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@manusa manusa merged commit 79284f3 into fabric8io:master Jul 23, 2021
@manusa manusa deleted the fix/openshift-mock-server-https-ignored branch July 23, 2021 04:26
@manusa manusa self-assigned this Jul 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants