-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 326
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consensus-layer Call 109 #783
Comments
If we have time, I want to discuss the
It's not the highest priority, so tackling it at the end of the call is fine. p.s. @djrtwo, one typo on agenda: should be May 18th |
Whoops - a few things got posted to the wrong agenda:
|
Also this one please ethereum/consensus-specs#3346 |
I'd also like to discuss the latest updates to EIP-4788. Reflecting a decision on a previous ACDE, we decided the CL would send the current slot, rather than have the EL compute them from the timestamp to avoid the violation of the abstraction barrier from CL to EL. I've made updates here: |
Confirmation Rule PR: ethereum/consensus-specs#3339 |
I would like to make an update on ethereum/execution-apis#407 |
Could we please discuss changing |
@lightclient I believe we can't as this one has already passed 😄 |
shit haha - okay in call 110 can we please discuss |
call 110 agenda accumulator: @djrtwo |
Closed in favour of #796 |
Consensus-layer Call 109 Agenda
prev: call 108
Meeting Date/Time: Thursday 2023/5/18 at 14:00 UTC
Meeting Duration: 1.5 hours
Livestream
blob_kzg_commitments
size limit to MAX_BLOB_COMMITMENTS_PER_BLOCK (4096) consensus-specs#3338engine_newPayloadV3
to passversioned_hashes
to EL for validation consensus-specs#3359The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: