-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 997
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add mandatory deposit index ordering #594
Conversation
Co-requisite with #589
specs/core/0_beacon-chain.md
Outdated
@@ -1478,6 +1479,7 @@ def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit], | |||
# Ethereum 1.0 chain data | |||
latest_eth1_data=latest_eth1_data, | |||
eth1_data_votes=[], | |||
deposit_index=0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should default to len(initial_validator_deposits)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done. Though note that all this introduces one issue: if there are bad deposits before launch, then there will be a bunch of deposits that have to be reprocessed before any new deposits can be processed. I guess it's fine because they'll all fail due to the pubkey uniqueness check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so. This will ensure that we don't have to attempt to process any failed deposits -- thus starting from the next deposit after the initial.
I'm assuming that initial_validator_deposits
includes invalid ones that will just get skipped over in process_deposit
below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or am I missing something
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aah I see, if initial_validator_deposits includes invalid ones then there's no issue.
* Rename 1. `get_initial_beacon_state` -> `get_genesis_beacon_state` 2. `initial_validator_deposits` -> `genesis_validator_deposits` * Add BeaconState.deposit_index (ethereum/consensus-specs#594) * Use BLS-based RANDAO types and modify `process_deposit` * Remove outdated per-slot `proposer.randao_layers` and `state.latest_randao_mixes` update * Update eth2/beacon/types/blocks.py Co-Authored-By: hwwhww <[email protected]>
Co-requisite with #589