Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SSZ list Merkle hashing change #538

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 3, 2019
Merged

SSZ list Merkle hashing change #538

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 3, 2019

Conversation

vbuterin
Copy link
Contributor

The current spec is arguably inconsistent, in that if a set of N values gets chunked into M chunks where M is not an exact power of 2, the chunks between M and next_power_of_2(M) are filled with SSZ_CHUNK_SIZE zero bytes each, but the last chunk is not padded, and could be arbitrarily short (eg. if the values are 4 bytes and there are 257 of them, then that gets serialized into eight chunks chunks where the first four are 64 values each, the fifth is 4 bytes corresponding to the last value, and the last three chunks are SSZ_CHUNK_SIZE zero bytes). This PR fills every chunk up to exactly SSZ_CHUNK_SIZE bytes for consistency.

The current spec is arguably inconsistent, in that if a set of N values gets chunked into M chunks where M is not an exact power of 2, the chunks between M and next_power_of_2(M) are filled with SSZ_CHUNK_SIZE zero bytes each, but the last chunk is not padded, and could be arbitrarily short (eg. if the values are 4 bytes and there are 257 of them, then that gets serialized into eight chunks chunks where the first four are 64 values each, the fifth is 4 bytes corresponding to the last value, and the last three chunks are SSZ_CHUNK_SIZE zero bytes). This PR fills every chunk up to exactly SSZ_CHUNK_SIZE bytes for consistency.
specs/simple-serialize.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specs/simple-serialize.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specs/simple-serialize.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants