Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

ethereum / consensus-specs Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 994
Star 3.6k

Code
Issues 153
Pull requests 85
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

Sync Committee vs Aggregate naming consistencies#2469

Merged

protolambda merged 3 commits intodevethereum/consensus-specs:devfrom sync-consistencyethereum/consensus-specs:sync-consistencyCopy head branch name to clipboard

Jun 7, 2021

+14-14

Conversation Commits3 (3)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Jun 7, 2021

ensure consistency about sync committees vs aggregates in naming throughout
djrtwo
committed
patch tests
djrtwo
committed
update sync aggregate processing reference in validator doc
protolambda
committed

Footer

© 2024 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.