Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add missing word "valid" in attestation gossip conditions #1744

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ Attestation subnets are used to propagate unaggregated attestations to subsectio
- The attestation's committee index (`attestation.data.index`) is for the correct subnet.
- `attestation.data.slot` is within the last `ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE` slots (within a `MAXIMUM_GOSSIP_CLOCK_DISPARITY` allowance) -- i.e. `attestation.data.slot + ATTESTATION_PROPAGATION_SLOT_RANGE >= current_slot >= attestation.data.slot` (a client MAY queue future attestations for processing at the appropriate slot).
- The attestation is unaggregated -- that is, it has exactly one participating validator (`len([bit for bit in attestation.aggregation_bits if bit == 0b1]) == 1`).
- There has been no other attestation seen on an attestation subnet that has an identical `attestation.data.target.epoch` and participating validator index.
- There has been no other valid attestation seen on an attestation subnet that has an identical `attestation.data.target.epoch` and participating validator index.
- The block being voted for (`attestation.data.beacon_block_root`) passes validation.
- The signature of `attestation` is valid.

Expand Down