docs: enhancements and typos #708
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@cpengilly has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 38 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent updates aim to refine the documentation for the Optimism ecosystem. Changes include clarifying transaction fee descriptions, correcting errors, enhancing explanations of processes and mechanisms, and improving readability. These modifications strive to offer clearer and more accurate information while maintaining the core functionality of the system. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
pages/stack/protocol/outages.mdx (7)
Line range hint
16-16: Consider using a more concise expression.- Sequencer is still able to receive and process L2 transactions + Sequencer can still receive and process L2 transactionsThis change applies to both instances where this phrase occurs. It makes the sentence more direct and easier to read.
Also applies to: 44-44
Line range hint
50-50: Add commas for clarity.- Users may observe that the "safe" and "finalized" block heights of the L2 chain appear to remain stuck while the "unsafe" block height continues to increase. + Users may observe that the "safe" and "finalized" block heights of the L2 chain appear to remain stuck, while the "unsafe" block height continues to increase.Adding a comma before "while" improves the readability of the sentence by clearly separating the clauses.
Line range hint
97-98: Rephrase to avoid repetitive sentence beginnings.Consider rephrasing the list to vary the sentence structure and avoid repetition. For example:
1. Transactions sent within a specific L1 block are processed together. 2. Each transaction is given a timestamp no more than `max_sequencer_drift` in the future. 3. They are processed in the order they are received and within the `sequencer_window`.This change avoids the repetitive use of "Transactions are processed" at the beginning of each point.
Line range hint
100-100: Add a comma for clarity.- If the Sequencer is unavailable or transactions are not published to L1 within this `sequencer_window`, OP Stack chains will automatically reorganize themselves to guarantee that these transactions are included in the L2 chain. + If the Sequencer is unavailable, or transactions are not published to L1 within this `sequencer_window`, OP Stack chains will automatically reorganize themselves to guarantee that these transactions are included in the L2 chain.Adding a comma after "unavailable" helps clarify the conditions under which the OP Stack chains will reorganize.
Line range hint
112-112: Add a comma after 'scenario'.- In this scenario we'll assume that the Sequencer is completely unavailable and unable to process any transactions. + In this scenario, we'll assume that the Sequencer is completely unavailable and unable to process any transactions.This change applies to both instances where this phrase occurs. Adding a comma after "scenario" improves the readability by clearly separating the introductory phrase from the main clause.
Also applies to: 138-138
Line range hint
139-139: Correct the conjunction usage.- A user sends a transaction to the `OptimismPortal` during the downtime and but the Sequencer comes back online and includes the transaction in an L2 block before the full `sequencer_window` ends. + A user sends a transaction to the `OptimismPortal` during the downtime, and the Sequencer comes back online and includes the transaction in an L2 block before the full `sequencer_window` ends.Removing the extra conjunction "but" clarifies the sentence.
Line range hint
160-161: Consider using a more concise expression and correct the comma usage.- the Sequencer is able to include the second user's transaction before the first user's transaction is included. + the Sequencer can include the second user's transaction before the first user's transaction is included.This change makes the sentence more direct and easier to read. Additionally, consider adding a comma before "but" if it connects two independent clauses.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Description
Miscellaneous enhancements and typo fixes.