Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update branch from master #157

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Nov 24, 2021
Merged

update branch from master #157

merged 18 commits into from
Nov 24, 2021

Conversation

nikosbosse
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #157 (ba120ae) into simplify-eval-forecasts (29ac025) will increase coverage by 5.52%.
The diff coverage is 83.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                     Coverage Diff                     @@
##           simplify-eval-forecasts     #157      +/-   ##
===========================================================
+ Coverage                    48.44%   53.97%   +5.52%     
===========================================================
  Files                           18       18              
  Lines                         1348     1347       -1     
===========================================================
+ Hits                           653      727      +74     
+ Misses                         695      620      -75     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/eval_forecasts_continuous_integer.R 69.64% <0.00%> (ø)
R/pairwise-comparisons.R 42.36% <0.00%> (ø)
R/utils.R 71.42% <ø> (+7.93%) ⬆️
R/eval_forecasts.R 67.27% <66.66%> (+1.20%) ⬆️
R/plot.R 20.29% <92.30%> (+20.29%) ⬆️
R/bias.R 87.93% <100.00%> (ø)
R/pit.R 56.09% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 29ac025...ba120ae. Read the comment docs.

@nikosbosse nikosbosse merged commit 42f4d8b into simplify-eval-forecasts Nov 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants